I have a couple premium vehicle squad suggestions id definitely pay money for. Not sure how regularly the developers read these posts but I thought I post this suggestion anyway. I think it would be really cool if enlisted did a premium Tiger H1 (131) squad and premium Sherman M4A3E8 (Brad Pitts tank) from the movie Fury. Some people will probably disagree with me but like i said id seriously pay money for those. If they added the foliage on the tiger like the movie. Or the Sherman with Fury painted on the barrel and the tank equipped all the on screen equipment on it. I know world of tanks did that but I’d be cool to see in enlisted. Another suggestion for a battle pass tank camo, add tiger 131 from the Bovington museum as a camo for the tiger H1. That would make buying the battle pass completely worth it. One last suggestion, if you play br 1-3 you can only use a br3 tank or plane once. Or 4-5 you can only use a br5 vehicle once. So basically once you are destroyed or shot down you can no longer respond with that vehicle until you load into a new match. But br 1 or 2 (if playing br 1-3) or br 4 (if playing br 4-5) you can respond as many times you like. As much as I like tanking it gets old to keep dying to king tigers, and p51s and jets none stop. But then again I’m kinda half and half on this. One side says that would limit the game especially if you get spawn killed with king tiger that wouldn’t be fair. But the other side, that forces people to use other tanks besides king tigers none stop.
The Fury one sounds more like i would be better as a Battle Pass skin.
That is, if there are no copy right issues around it.
I’d be cool with it either as a premium or battle pass, but yeah I didn’t think of that. They might not be able to for copy right reasons. But if copy right was a problem I’m willing to bet at least for tiger 131. If they called up the Bovington tank museum and asked them to use 131 in exchange that they would sponsor them they’d more then likely say yes.
That’s an interesting legal question, do museums hold the copyright for the use of historical artefacts they own? I would guess “no” but I’m not a legal expert, so the Tiger one might be up for grabs, the only question would be to go in there and copy down the details of it in person…