Using the Enlisted Resource to prove German bias

pretty much, it’s the maximum dispersion angle

2 Likes

what?
image

image

image

image

1 Like

I won’t comment on the jumbo but the M2 carbine sights are hard to use

I will agree it’s quite cringe to call people you don’t like “Nazis”

Again I won’t comment on the jumbo but if 9 soldiers could have a BAR instead of 3, it’d be different.

Everyone at this time exclusively used explosion packs which insta kill tanks.

It’s much more convenient to build ammo crates on the point then on the run, plus landing a rifle grenade through the bunker openings wasn’t easy.

LOOK HERE LOOK LISTEN! Just because I’m a console player doesn’t mean I can’t say someone at the top leaderbord ain’t good, so stop giving advice you know nothing about.

Worst gun in the game, your opinion can’t be taken serious at this point

1 Like

no i can think of worse guns

This has to be bait, there’s no recoil at all and does decent damage per second, you can clear rooms with it in Berlin with ease just don’t run in there raw dogging it

1 Like

If you can clear entire rooms with the FNAB, some iron sight shouldn’t be a problem.
Especially since consoles have an auto-aim.

I find it more cringeworthy to call everyone who didn’t like wasted statements (since they were wrong) German Mains without evidence, but you are not so much into evidence anyway.
Especially since that would be 95% of the forum.
Or a Soviet Main explains that the Soviets suffer because the German Mains already do it, and they do not entertain us with those cringe made-up ratios no one uses except its creator.

Bunkers are also enclosed, which is better for explosives to spread, and most people don’t even build rallies, so it must have been a big issue exclusively made by defenders… on one map. You could also just build ammo as an attacker on a specific spot to farm chokepoints and spawns, and Germany only had one map where they were always defending… so don’t you see the German bias? Do we need another made-up ratio that makes no sense to prove it?

Puh, those are hard words for someone on a three-year rant now to prove that it is not his fault that he cannot use the PPSh properly. Didn’t age well.
Not all console players are bad, but usually, those do not need to turn off crossplay, either.
And Enlisted is still not really impressive. Just grab a P-47 or a Tiger, and that’s it, let alone in the old days when you faced bots en mas.

Well. Were you not the one who, despite playing the game for over 3.1k hours and being in the forum for 2 years and so, did not know that the ingame stats were wrong?
I am very sorry that I cannot meet your level of demand in terms of expertise. Let me invent some ratios, too, and it will be fine.

2 Likes

At that point I would say that he was right, but at that moment the allies had the jumbo, and he didn’t talked about that one huh? however the game has changed a lot since then, the only bias I see is allies getting to have 18 rockets and a 500lb bomb if 2 planes are used at the same time which, in my humble opinion is, a bit overkill, and once they get to have the pershing they wont have a reasonable argument to have that big gap in plane power when compared to the germans, I wont talk about the soviets, because I dont really play them at high br, or middle, so I dont think I have enough knowledge about them to complain about anything there, everything I know of them is only from my perspective when fighting them, and just as western allies, I feel like soviets have very clear strenghts

1 Like

Bruh.
FG42 II is exactly the same as FG42 but with less recoil and even then fg42 II has twice as much recoil than AVT-40.
M2 Carbine’a recoil is just a quarter of FG42 II’s recoil. :skull:

2 Likes