Japan should never have been added to the game unless they were going to fight two factions at the same time just like they did with the Americans and the Germans. This way it would have went full circle much sooner than it already will.
It’s understandable that the game just started as Soviet vs German, then America got added resulting in America vs German. Leaving Germany is the only faction fighting two people. Leading to them adding Japan… And well the rest is history. Point is they should have made it go full circle to begin with, by the time the merge happened both Japan and the USSR should have had fought each other.
2 Likes
OK, but the maximum weapon is Br 3. Maps from Khalkhin Gol 1939, not Manchuria 1945.
They should add both and i’m more interested in Manchuria.
Manchuria is better then Khalkhin Gol the maps will be amazing you will have city maps with Japan. Since we can’t have invasion of China this will do so Manchuria is much better choice.
4 Likes
They should really look into organizing this event as soon as possible. It will be a huge opportunity for them since no other WW2 game has ever decided to add this front (as far as I am aware). Now that we have Steam it would be extra beneficial for the overall growth of the game. Japan at BR V is adequately prepared to take on the Soviets. Though we need better AT weapons. That’s it. Looks like it will most probably be a ‘Combat Event’ and not a permanent game mode. But they can take in the results of this event and develop a separate map pack for the Soviets vs. Japan.
1 Like
Compare the equipment of the Soviet Br 5 and the Japanese. Your idea makes no sense.
Don’t worry I’m preparing a suggestion with a bit BR V equipment for Japan
1 Like
The USSR will still have an advantage. An idea that makes no sense
USSR will stand no chance !
then this is also bad, you need to keep a balance, even if it is asymmetric
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/af386/af38600f4bdf0d9018b0f6cd4989a29ce34604c2" alt="image"
The rest of the game doesnt limit weapons in battles that occured before the weapon was introduced, idk why it would have to for USSR v Japan either
It doesnt have to be historically accurate to the letter, after all Enlisted players arent HLL snobs
lmao this is sarcasm right? USSR would absolutely destroy Japan
Good luck with that Soviets have no chance against us even US and UK are stuck at New Georgia … what chance USSR has
? Do you mean Germans? USSR doesnt play US
And I play USSR High BR - All Consoles North America (only because I lag on Euro servers) and we win probably 70-80% if the time
USSR has the best free weapons too IMO, not to mention body amour
We have Toblerone on a stick and pepper tank data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/47fdc/47fdc7d3b06d0fab8c7c50f680a425453548677e" alt=":smiley: :smiley:"
idk what you mean by that but USSR has the best:
SMG
Assault Rifle
plus the fact that USSR’s Full auto Rifle starts on auto so AI shoots in auto
and we have 2 different 100rd mg’s so you can double carry and switch between em without sacrificing ammo can be ignored
I don’t really play vechiles so idk how they stack up
but the IS2’s massive cannon can (I think) 1 shot the Tiger 2(H) almost anywhere it hits
If they’re smart this won’t be an event, This will be a permanent Soviet versus Japan battle area.
1 Like
Fake AK47 vs Type HI + Shield rifle lol