It doesn’t make sense to limit 3 maps for every 2 br, on top of the fact that the game has a maximum of 10 maps, at most they limit them, in the end you end up playing the same maps 24/7
If you don’t feel like creating maps, you could create an event where players create them for you.
In the end there are always better maps where the community than in the game itself.
5 Likes
Tunisia maps would be hell at higher BRs, with all the explosions so I think it’s best if Tunisia doesn’t go to br5
6 Likes
So they should make more maps, the current situation is horrible.
2 Likes
Sure, that sounds great, I’m always open to new content.
c4qph2
August 30, 2025, 2:53pm
5
To avoid writing the same thing a hundred times, I will use quotes.
1 ) Preservation of the remains of the historical component (those crumbs that they have not yet managed to cynically executed and trample into the dirt)
2 ) Pseudo-opportunity to choose maps. The player can choose the BR that corresponds to his most preferred set of maps. Some people just hate Berlin and Seelow. And some even Stalingrad. And someone wants to play in Tunisia and only in Tunisia.
3 ) Very open early BR maps with excellent line of fire from one end to the other, which will turn into a concentrated essence of HUMAN SUFFERING if there are high BR tanks on them.
The maps of Moscow and Tunisia are very open. As usual, they are one huge shot from one end to the other. 88 and 122 high-explosive shells, as well as HVAR and some laserguns like FG or RD on such maps are a PAIN. For same reason, everyone simply hates maps of the Pacific Ocean. But PO is much worse.
6 Likes
Only with Map Bans where you could ban entire campaigns. It wouldn’t work with current garbage map picking system.
6 Likes
No, thanks. Tunisia should be limited as much as possible.
3 Likes
戈кıуo人
August 30, 2025, 4:05pm
9
tunisia was absolute hell when they tested it out
Moskau wasnt any better
No br5 in Tunisia plz !
Or remove all limitation for customization option
Unfortunately the devs map devs are either absent or just really slow. We have only gotten 1 map this year that you can hardly even call new. Focus has shifted on active matter
1 Like
MR_87
August 30, 2025, 4:41pm
12
Plz don’t
We was able to filter half conquest mission
Now the dislike tag is extremely lacking
3 Likes
Yes, we know that they are focused solely and exclusively on paid content xD
only because everyone went into it with a bad mindset.
I have wanted it forever which granted that’s why i enjoyed it but sure there were some vehicle moments but what did i do? Take them out!
If some players really want to play br5 in Tunisia, they should create their own custom matchs in br5 in Tunisia.
No, instead change Berlin back to BR 4-5 and make Stalingrad + Rzhev BR 1-3.
1 Like
戈кıуo人
August 31, 2025, 1:16pm
17
tunisia is already a shitfest in br 3
and going in there with p47s king tigers rocket tanks etc just doesnt work on that map
3 Likes
戈кıуo人
August 31, 2025, 1:16pm
18
why make stalingrad and rzhev br 1-3 they work fine as they are rn
Because both battles ended in 1943 and didn’t see Tiger 2s or post-war Soviet jets.
Totally irrational argument. There’s plenty of stuff in BR4/5 from which you could make pure early/mid war lineup.
KV2
KV1 (the improved version)
Federov
AVS variants
PPSh drum
AVT variants
SVT
PPD drum
DT-29
Maxim-tokarev
BM-41 mortar
This is just TT stuff than comes to mind.
Stop pushing your dogmatic restrictions that doesn’t make any sense whatsover. BRs simply doesn’t reflect the year of deployment. I guess that’s way too hard to understand for you.