"Unleashing Soviet Thunder: The BM-13 "Katyusha" Rocket Launcher"

Comrades!

Gather 'round, for I bring news that’ll have you itching for battle like never before. The Soviet faction is about to get a serious upgrade, and it goes by the name of the BM-13 “Katyusha” Rocket Launcher!

That’s right, we’re talking about the big guns now. Imagine sitting behind the controls of this bad boy, ready to rain down a storm of rockets on anyone fool enough to stand in our way. Tanks, infantry, fortified positions—nothing stands a chance against the might of the Katyusha.

But here’s the best part: mobility. This ain’t your grandpa’s artillery. No, sir! The Katyusha rolls onto the battlefield with style, giving us the freedom to strike wherever and whenever we damn well please. It’s like having our own personal fireworks show, except the fireworks are explosives, and the show is total annihilation.

So, comrades, here’s the plan: we load up, we roll out, and we make those fascist pigs regret ever setting foot on our soil. With the Katyusha leading the charge, victory is not just a possibility—it’s a guarantee.

Get ready to unleash hell, comrades. The Soviet Union marches forward, and nothing can stand in our way!

For glory and honor,
Harmlessbot
(joking, but still they should add it, its a ww2 iconic weapon)****

3 Likes

For what reason did you choose Katyusha over Andryusha then?

Probably cause it’s more iconic

without this i dont think soviet faction is complete also it could be better if there is seperate research line for MLRS/Artillery

No, artillery gameplay is toxic by default.

Katyusha in Enlisted should be played the same way as panzerwerfer or the already present Soviet rocket tank

1 Like

And I don’t think the American faction is complete with the M20 Super Bazooka and a Recoilless Rifle of some sort (preferably a big one)

1 Like

Wait don’t we both advocate for the M26 T99? lol

Are you planning to use it as artillery or what? (Meaning throwing poopies at enemies from behind the hill.)

1 Like

Nah dude I’m frontlines fighter. It’s boring sitting in the back where no one can touch you and you can only see 5 pixels moving across your screen. Get me IN THAT ACTION. Been using the 105 to level it up and it’s been great since I got that loader

2 Likes

Ever seen 25 lives go up in flames in a single HE shot that wasn’t inside objective building? lol. I got it saved I just need to upload it to YT as a short at some point

1 Like

I’d call it real tactics, it’s just not for you FPS fans.
real arty gameplay only exists in big action mod.

Yeah, while I was playing WoT for a few years I was a really fps player xD

There isn’t a single game where artillery improves the gameplay experience.
Show me such a game.

And stop with those lame personal attacks.

Who cares? It definitely isnt improving gameplay in any way

Did you mean “FPS fan” is a personal attacks word?
Wow, i wouldn’t say that.

How would you define improves the gameplay experience?
Artillery can play a major role in games such as “HLL” and “Foxhole”, and not many players complain about this.

Artillery gameplay (mortar in vanilla enlisted) includes intel acquisition, team communication, and basic math, and you just sum it up with “is toxic by default”. But you also refuse to call yourself an “FPS fan”, so what exactly are you? tank camper? CAS pilot?

Artillery is the main force of killing and destruction in land battles. Why is it toxic to interpret it in a game? I thought only “FPS fans” who are keen on front-line battles would think so.

Well, it’s not reflecting reality. :man_shrugging: Since I am mainly rpg player.
And it definitely wasn’t about challenging my opinion.

I really couldn’t care less how are you going to call it. It was completely unnecessary.

Btw. Personal attacks =//= insults.

which is entirely different game, with entirely different playerbase.
Just because rocket jumping was cool in quake, 25 killstreak nuke in cod or the redeemer unreal tournament doesnt mean they would be fine or cool here.

Above different game different audience