1 Like
6 minutes sheesh
2 Likes
This is basically what I’m talking about in this thread from a few days ago. Completely one sided games
If it makes ya feel any better, I’m consistently top 3 if not first place in most of my matches too. Especially when we lose and no one did anything all match. And yeah, some campaigns you do fight overwhelming numbers of bots. Lot of people complaining there are no, or at least no good, Axis players in Normandy, so Allies kinda curb stomp 9/10 times. Pacific, most of the good players maxed it out and left. There’s few people playing Japan capable of holding off the onslaught of Americans. Meanwhile, there are practically no Allies players in Berlin. It’s nothing but an Axis bot grind fest. Tunisia is doing…well it’s something. Axis are more often than not going to win, but there are matches I had with good teammates on the Allies. And heck this was last night. Won like 3-5 games and then had 3 straight losses back to back where we just got absolutely steamrolled and told to sit down
You just gotta pick the right campaign to have a good fight. Tunisia probably has one of the healthier player bases because of the Paratroopers, but also is kinda lacking in the Allies department because of Axis Paratroopers. Normandy will never be a bad choice. It’s fricking Normandy. Moscow is biased towards Allies, but Axis does get some wins here and there. Just stay away from Berlin and Pacific if you want decent matches every so often. Lol
1 Like
YES. The game right now is one-sided, which is why the merge idea came from, but after the merge, they need to balance Attack/defence mechanic : )
typical 4 stack rape against new players/bots.
1 Like
Seen lots of generals with premium Panzer IIIs, Panzer IVs and Paratroopers in Tunisia lately. Easy grind for the rank most of the time there right now.
