You miss your chance for an easy game huge chance and i hope you never get an easy game like this one ever again since you didnt have faith in the team and look at that we won while you left like a fool
but then again half of the people that left are chinese korean and jap so i guess it expected
ranks are not a measurement of skill, but of matches played. one thing and the other can not be related on a 1 to 1 basis. is a common mistake.
Or!
Ppl just don’t want to play conquests.
I’d even say that people don’t want to face resistance.
0 points means they left clearly because they do not like conquest.
Meh. Seeing all of those didn’t even set foot in the match at all… it’s probably the mode…
Or! Again, tier 3 gamble which I understand perfectly.
i guess i couldnt really blame them if they didnt like the mode
personally (probably a hot take) i like conquest
Oh I swear just recently I spotted a group of you people here on the Forums and I gotta say I felt bad for leaving that match - but then I remembered that I promised to myself that I would never play Moscow Mannor Assault ever again.
So no hard feelings.
indeed.
seems people are allergic to challenges… ( that is, once in a while at least. but no. not even that )
People say that a lot here, and while it’s technically true; if you play more and win enough to reach Marshal, you almost certainly have better gear and more experience. So it stands to reason that the probability is higher that someone with the rank of Marshal will play better and harder than someone of a lower rank.
I haven’t done a comprehensive study, but my experience has been that teams with lots of gold ranked players perform better than teams of silver ranked players on average. I’d go as far as to say that a stacked gold ranked team losing to a lower ranked team is an outlier.
For me the best indicator is which team has more players with name decorations of any kind.
yea since some gold rank are from farming bad player and that why i call them fake high skill marshal
None of which are actually skill - playing more gives the OPPORTUNITY to have higher skill through practice… but not everyone takes advantage of it.
How relevant is that though? It takes dozens of hours and hundreds of matches to rank up to Marshal. How many people are actually playing the game that much and dedicating that much time while gaining no applicable skill or knowledge?
Of course it’s possible, and I wouldn’t be surprised if there was a wide skill range in the pool of gold ranked players, but I’d bet money that a team stacked with gold ranked players will out perform a team of silver ranked players in the vast majority of matches.
I just think that it’s a mistake to discount rank entirely like people do on these forums.
it is very simple. a good chunk of the marshalls you see around, exploited the completely one sided campaigns we had till now to rack up levels by destroying the bots and winning by default.
i guess the same will happen the next battlepass, unless measures are taken to balance the population.
The only way you gonna make me play conquest is with the XP bonus.
Conquest is boring in this game.
I’ve seen this so many times in various game modes. As soon as the first inconvenience hits them, they hit the disconnect button…
It’s even more hilarious when you end up winning the match anyway without them.
Funny thing is, last week I had this happen whilst playing Japan, not all the players had connected in the game yet, we lost the first point, all the marshal-ranked players left the match, by the time we hit the 2nd or 3rd objective, the US players couldn’t even reach the point and we won. One of the players about to leave our team stayed because I called him out in the chat and said I was “merely “upset” they couldn’t carry me to victory”. XD
my “great discovery” was that bots at least run towards the objective, so sometimes you will start winning once all the deadweights leave, you just have to make sure to clear the path so enough of the bots make through
also, currently the Marshall ranks are kind of meaningless, since you could just PvE them in old empty campaigns in like, a week
Funny people not liking conquest with task that require you to play 10 games…
Yep - bots can be better than useless people - must be some reasonably clever programming!!
Yep - often 2-5 players disconnect with 0 score and 0 deaths in a game - useless male-poultry-suckers!
