Confirmed. Looks fine.
Really? Did you also check other replays of this guy?
If cheating can be determined solely through two squatting shots in the training field(I can even notice some differences between the second shot and the first shot), then we may need to attach hand recordings when uploading similar videos in the future. XD
…
They did not.
That’s the point…
you did first, here:
I simply said it was the other way around.
…
But, if you (wrongfully) believe this is a buff, I won’t stop you and even be happy for you, eh.
What about the evidence? Which Soviet main has requested the 990rof FG42?
If you can’t even find this guy, there’s no need to continue arguing.
The squatting stance can reduce 30% of recoil, and when paired with the vertical recoil reduction skill, it can lower a weapon’s recoil to a terrifyingly low value.
go see the main update post from today, and read through it. (he even admits it himself here).
I just like to correctly point out “forum history” stuff. In the end, I don’t care much about the fate of fg42 and avs, as they are SF rifles and I don’t use them too much. was only glad about the damage boost last time, because it made sense to equalize damage values between factions.
I can’t find him from so many topics, screenshots or links.
Another vulnerability, since FG42 already has 990rof, why does he require a higher rof AVS? If you think this is a form of weakening, then why did he weaken the Soviet?
???
You’d better think calmly.
Skill issue,try higher rank soldier with perks , firing in crouching pose,and higher FOV.Than you will find out that almost all automatic rifles in this game are controllable.
2 Likes
Well,it seems that your logic is full of loopholes,and there is no evidence either.
No one will believe your conspiracy theories.
I admit I was being a bit presumptuous. In fact, the Soviet Union isn’t my main faction. Although I’ve researched all their weapons and equipment, I don’t really like this faction that much. If you can’t even beat a weeb jerking off to 2D waifus, maybe the problem is you.
If you read my post properly, you would understand why I wanted to suggest a fun change to the FG-42 v1
The FG rifles in the tech tree are so similar that there will not be a reason to use the version 1 model. By giving it a role as a CQC weapon, it remains relevant in some way and its fun. Nobody is using the FG-42-1 when FG-42-2 exists, they are identical.
AVT-40 and AVS-36 are already separated in their stats.
The AVS-36 is a higher power rifle, for use at longer ranges (hence why there is a sniper version)
The AVS has a faster ads speed and “open” sights. The weapon is meant for longer range engagements.
The AVT-40 on the other hand has faster reloads, and weighs less, suiting a playstyle focused more on CQC engagements, with its “closed” ring sight being easier to use in closer ranges. This is also why the weapon has lower damage, as it doesnt need to shoot at those ranges as often / should be weaker than the AVS.
These weapons ALSO have different recoil “patterns” or tendencies to their randomness. The FG-42 rifles have the exact same. My suggestions were to separate the rifles and bring an old classic out of obscurity (in the shadow of its bigger brother) by giving it a unique niche.
Taking the long range version of this weapon and ruining it with a massive 880 rate of fire, while still only having 15 round magazines goes COMPLETELY against the role of this rifle. The weapon does not need to be separated from the AVT-40 as it is already different enough and offers a different playstyle. The AVS-36 change (I’m not going to call it a buff, its going to kill the rifle in my opinion) is ridiculous, and appealing ONLY to historical accuracy does not improve the fun of the game for all players.
Do you want to use AVS in fully automatic mode for long-range shooting? You’d be wiser to use semi-automatic mode.
660rof is destined to be unsuitable for CQC, as it cannot withstand FG-422 at close range.That’s why the 880rof rifle was important to the Soviet.
The statement ‘880rof will destroy AVS’ is completely nonsense. You can use semi-automatic mode at long range and fully automatic mode at close range, which can handle most situations. The only problem is the disadvantage of loading time and magazine, but it is much better than using a 660 rof rifle to CQC with FG42.
And AVT will become another rifle with better operation, at the cost of lower rof.
Well, maybe this is what you want, but I am not going to reply to you further, in any case.
Have a nice day 
Similarly, I wouldn’t care about a guy’s extremely exaggerated statements.
How are you not aware that the weapons on the test server usually have bugged recoil making them laser guns?
when it comes to this topic the devs admitted it they buffed the AVS rof and recoil and since wee have the 20 bullets version of AVT tha tmakes the situation even worse to beggin with
There was definitely no recoil in the first test.
Of course, by the second test, the horizontal recoil was changed to be significant.
It’s not written in the patch notes, but it can definitely feel it
If fact it was smentioned on the post where the ppsh-41 s got replaced
I don’t see the note that the Recoil of AVS in the first test and the Recoil of AVS in the second test have been changed.
But if you actually do it, it’s definitely different.