The new enlisted is a real S**T, once we could choose the scenary historicly accurate(italy in africa, russians in russia) Now I can play with an italian tank at north france THATS BIZARRE. Devs, congratulations, you really RUINED THE ENTIRE GAME, YES, YOU ARE CAPABLE OF THAT, TAKE A GOOD GAME AN PUT IT ON THE TOILET AND FLUSH IT ALL.
11 Likes
Never forget the Mkb and ZH and F2 and Waffen SS with Proto MG42 in Moscow 1941.
1 Like
Do you generally think that if sth is not perfect, its fine to just make it worse?
3 Likes
We dont have players and no historical accuracy and “immersion” only if you lower standards.
So at least try to get more players.
1 Like
Good luck.
I agree think its time for me to leave ruined with the changes total shyte
3 Likes
DF been coping that their game was Historically authentic but it was a somewhat false statement from the start but post merge damn not even a single trace of any HA are there to be seen game have become yet another WT.
1 Like
Did Hitler got the RPG from Indiana Jones after he tried to blow up the Ark?
1 Like
I agree. Although I enjoy the tech tree, essentially the removal of squads completely is dumb as hell. I also don’t enjoy the consolidation of the nations, I don’t believe it was necessary. Keeping the nations separate, but with campaign divisions, would have been much better. For example, the nation tabs could’ve been like we have now but with other drop-downs for the different campaigns the nation participated in. And yes, I agree that Enlisted didn’t have much historical accuracy in the first place, mostly hurt by the time discrepancies between weapons, but this new merge, where German pilots in Italian planes can be flying over France, bombing British troops, is just absolutely ridiculous. I find it astounding that after all the developers’ hard work, they throw their amazing creation’s main attraction into the shredder.
- Sicnerely, Thunderbird879
1 Like
Some German Squadrons did use Italian Aircraft and British troops were in France I don’t know it the Germans used and Italian aircraft to bomb them at most mabey strafe them in areas they operated
Of course, I noticed I didn’t phrase that very well, and all of those are true in certain situations, but on such a large scale, where just any old soldiers, specialized and organized for the unforgiving environments on a completely different front, can just roll up in their bright yellow uniforms (In the case of the Italians in Normandy) on the green-blue plains of France without nigh on any changes to them, is just annoying to me. Albeit, again, soldiers from multiple countries participated on both sides, this was much less common than the soldiers of the most adjacent countries being present. I hope I explained myself better, and realized my own mistakes in this reply.
- Sincerely, Thunderbird879
Don’t forget the default Moscow guns being super rare carbines only given to the Gebirgsjager and cavalry troops.
Or the fact armies have been smashing into one another like its the Medieval ages when real combat was more akin to what Hell Let Loose portrays.
Or the STG-45M even being in the game as only 30 prototypes were made with zero combat records.
Or the AS-44 being in the game.
Or the RD-44.
Or the MG-30.
These “historically accurate” arguments are getting super old, seriously.
1 Like
“return the old enlisted” is a stupid suggestion, the merge is good. What need to be done is to improve the matching mechanism.
You’re right, Enlisted was never a historically accurate game
How many SS squads are currently in enlisted?
I feel so sad about all these people
This game is no longer historical
I just hope it’s balanced
10-15 but we just dont call them SS.
1 Like
depends, if we’re speaking of nonexistent HA then yes, since only thing that achieved was unbalanced bot games.
Current BR system could be easily fixed.
I prefer the old one as well.
1 Like