This game after last couple of patches became a dame joke and worst than any WW2 games I’ve played. The developers just slapping $%^T into the game without even thinking it through. For example… The balance has change in Axis favor. Tanks/SPG impenetrable, but they destroy Premium T-34-85 with 1 shot? is this a joke? If you people put Panter and a STuG into the game, why not IS-2 and ISU-152?. Even if you shoot side armor from point blank distance of any of those axis tanks/SPG, there aren’t any results, what so ever. All you get is loss of 1-2 tankers. Which is BS if you ask me. Hit to the rear of the tank must result in its immediate destruction regardless of it’s country of origin. Hit into the rear side should resulted in engine failure and/or engine fire. Side armor hit in the middle right under Turret should resulted in amo rack explosion and/or tank distraction. But every time you hit panther on the side, no matter which part of the side armor… nothing happens, not even a fricken loss of crew man!!! Are you people out of your fricken mind? do you think this $%^T through before you throw this $%^T into the game? Stug and Panther are impenetrable from the front. It does not mater in which part of the turret or hull you hit em, there is no effect except loss of 1-2 crewmen. Russian tanks get destroyed with 1 shot from Panzerfaust, but German tanks keep going with no damage after 4 shot from panzerfaust? is that a joke? On Russian side… (playing tanks and/or infantry) Most of the bullets going right thru axis solders, but Axis kill Russians with 1 shot, no matter what they shoot? Is that a joke? Secondly, because of all that, axis anti-tank units can not get close enough to enemy tanks to destroy them. And those guys just pounding shells in every direction without a fear to be taken out. So Soviet tanks are absolutely useless in this game. Than why even bother implementing it into ite? Panzer-IV, Panther, Stug can destroy T-34-85 with 1 shot into the turret, next to main gun where armor should be the thickest, but T-34 -85 can not destroy any of the German tanks no matter what you shoot… In this case I have an Idea for all of you retarded morons… Take Russian tanks out of the game, they are useless against German tanks and can be easily destroyed with a fricken brick from a mile away. If you implemented Panther and Stug, than Russian Tanks must be replaced with IS-2 with 122 mm main gun and ISU 152. You know why that should happened? Because the main vehicles Russian used during Battle for Berlin were ISU-152, IS-2, Artillery gun - ML-20 (205 mm). I dont see you people putting Tiger into the game on German side and Sherman on Allie, because that would be accurate, however no Sherman could ever destroy a tiger 1 on 1 head on, so Sherman would be useless, right? than why the hell are you doing this $%^T on Russian side? .
In Battle for Moscow… Premium tank T-50 made into SPG. Just FYI, T-50 used electrical mechanism to turn it’s turret, which means turret turned 90 degrees in 3 seconds. In this game it feels like turret it self weights 50 tons and it being rotated by a hamster in a wheel. So the only way to use this thing is to use it as SPG, NOT A TANK. I am seriously questioning your competence. Does any 1 in your team doing any research? Most of the maps in this campaign are forests, tanks are useless in forests, than why bother having them in that campaign? If you placing tanks, than the terrain should be much more open, not heavily and overly populated with foliage. Almost all strategic points in both (Battle for Berlin and Battle for Moscow) are located inside of the buildings, which are surrounded by other buildings, please, I am begging you, please explain to me how tanks can help get that point if… 1) tanks can not go inside of the building, 2) can not get any access to cap zone to at least provide a cover fire, 3) Tanks can not get close to cap zone buildings, because they get stuck on everything, including small debris, tree stomps, small bombing craters, trenches, bricks, small fence and so on… In your game, tanks are not tanks, they are oversized lawnmowers with very weak motors. Is common sense people, you want to make this game a better place? Well… consider what I’ve just wrote, and take a different approach to it. Think it through and think about it.
I meant to say can, can get close enough…
And the circle of meme continues.
oopss, sorry…coming through hehe. discussion haven’t started yet right?
you guys can have some
Mimimimimi
its not in the game
way to expose the fact you suck at tanks. Again, there isn’t even a stug in the game.
l2p issue, learn where to aim.
lol
yet another line which is tantamount to ‘i don’t know how to use tanks’
I have one for you - l2p
the fuck are you smoking? i want some.
they kill people around the point helping your team push closer. tell me you rode the shortbus to school without telling me you rode the shortbus to school.
they can? i bet you licked the windows too
then don’t drive over them? find another route, that’s half the skill in being a good, useful tanker. tldr skill issue l2p
I will tell you the same. But don’t think too hard, might hurt yourself.
Thanks for giving me a good laugh. This post was fantastic x)
Yeah, it is terrible and unrealistic. Maybe you should try Tunisia, the equipment is pretty accurate here. The most balance Campain in Enlisted.
It’s on topic, because it’s talking about historical accuracy in the game.
It doesn’t matter how many forum clowns disagree. I expected such a reaction because when anyone suggests a massive change as this, it’s going to get a negative / skeptical feedback.
What matters is that in a year you’re going to see them either implement the changes I said or the older campaigns are going to have a dead playerbase. (If not the game entirely).
It’s one of those things where no matter how much you hate my idea, you’re going to have to suck it up in the end.
I wasn’t able to read such long post. Can anyone say what happened there?
Afraid I had to stop also due to my eyes starting to bleed.
I think the OP is butt hurt somehow, maybe a new player.
Oh, I see. Thank you, dude.
Yeah pretty much Germans are OP and Russia suffers lulz and German tanks are invincible
Did he mention german airplanes? Aren’t they too good compared to soviet counterparts and need nerfs?
I couldn’t bother to read that far. Got to German tanks OP and quit
+
Tunisia arsenal contains 70% recycled stuff from Moscow and Normandy.
If Tunisia is broken, all those (weapons in those) campaigns are broken too.
I haven’t read the whole post yet, but I just had to stop right here. It’s weird that you say that, because I get my butt HANDED to me most of the time in Berlin, especially when playing on the defensive! I almost know for certain that we’re gonna lose. Some of the maps are not friendly toward Axis advance either, and that’s in their own damn city! I just thought wow, this is a very deviating experience from the one I’ve had. And my Berlin tank doesn’t hold up at all to the T-34-85 D-5T. Here’s another person complaining in the opposite way from you: 
Just find it interesting to see all the different perspectives. If Gaijin is known for one thing, it is not in making the Allies weak.