Things I and maybe some other players would like to see implemented into the game overtime

Suggestions
1

Weapons and tanks

Kv-8 (event/premium)
Kv-85
Ot-34(event/premium)
Ke7 and another type 99/96 lmg (as a 2nd sf rifle)
Suomi stick mag and drum mag added to the tech tree
BAR a2 and Johnson lmg (second version but only equippable by riflemen)

BR changes

Queue change from 1-2,3-4 and 5

Drum mag smgs below 100 rounds down tiered to br4

Maybe the bren 100 round to br4 as well (to be debated)

T-34-85’s to br5 and is-1 to br4 since the t-34-85’s are mostly preferred over the is-1 from what I’ve heard

Ai improvements

Command for a squad member to hand you their AP mine after you use yours

Command for a squad member to man a mounted gun of any sort (cannon, mount mg, hmg, etc)

Command for an ai with a bipod gun to mount their gun on any obstacle they can

Maps

Siege of Leningrad(blockade on the countryside outskirts and maybe even within the city)

Budapest castle

Late war counterpush battles (including operation bagration, and even some of the Eastern European countries (urban and countryside maps)

Late war maps from the Italian front like Sicily, mountains in northern Italy where the devils brigade fought

Southern France and liberation of Paris

Battle of Aachen

Shuri castle

Okinawa

  • this is all I can think of as of now. Anything anyone agrees/disagrees with. And if there’s anything I’ve missed that other players would like to see, please mention.
11 Likes
3

The T-34 85 is 100% a BR-4 tank, though the IS-1 being BR-4 isnt bad either.

Drum mag SMGs at BR4 could be a bit much, I mean like the thompson with the 50 round mag and the ppsh41 with the 71 round kinda fit into BR 5, at least they can compete there. might be a bit too dominating for BR 4, especially since each nation still have some great options in BR4 for SMGs.

Personally I dont think the liberation of Paris or the liberation of southern france really can be justified. Just too little fighting and certainly nothing interesting.

My own map group suggestions would be:

  • Sevastopol, a low to mid BR map group, some really interesting features, namely its fortresses.

  • Norway, a low BR map group, view interesting terrain features, namely the fjords.

  • Guadalcanal. low to mid BR map group, I mean its iconic for a reason.

  • Iwo Jima or Okinawa, a mid to high BR map group, again very iconic and very interesting terrain,
    …,…,…,…,…,…,…,…,…,…,…,. tunnel systems come to mind.

Otherwise everything else youve suggested seems fair and legitimate.

4

I fail to see how that’s a proper justification for increasing its BR.

5

To be fair the Tokyo arsenal, ppd bramit, and ppd 34/38 (40 should be foldered with it)are drum mag smg’s and are br4. Especially when what makes br5 what it is, is the SF rifles, assault rifles heavy tanks and 100 round mg’s.

6

None since I doubt the devs have any form of resources or the mental capacity to have long-term interests in anything lol

1 Like
7

That’s fair.

You know what actually, I would be eager to see how those come out if they ever develop these.

8

BOTS with higher then a three year old common sense and education.

9

My brother in Christ, anything you put on forum is to be debated.

Besides, do not suggest more than one BR change per suggestion because that leaves little room for debate and helpers can’t track which BR change players actually agree with.

2 Likes
10

you should probably not stuff like 12 different suggestions into 1 post, just saying

1 Like
11

Not to come off snarky or anything but how else should I do it? Split each category up into every posts?

12

Hhhhh,then Panzer III N need move to BR V as well.

13

Not really, I only say the t-34-85 since he heard from other users on Xbox say the chassy on the 34-85 is more maneuverable than the is-1’s but in retrospect I think it’s better again to keep it in br4.

1 Like
14

Yes thats for the best realistically, honestly each point in there should be its own post.

1 Like
15

tbf it should be given its late war HEAT shell and moved to BR3

16

Understood :+1:. I also apologize to the devs and helpers reading this post if it seems like an unorganized mess :sweat_smile:. I tried to add more spaces between the categories mentioned but the post’s format still had it come out the way I didn’t want it to

1 Like
17

yep, they expect you to post everything in a different topic.

18

i totally agree with the commands stuff. most players dont even know you can command other soldiers, they just view them as backups. this system needs a big rework to be easier and be more usefull

19

They are as backup but they shouldn’t just be there as fodder. You should be able to have them man mounted guns and cannons. Essentially turning the built guns into turrets. Couple more things if they implement it, for one you should be able to tell your bots that operate a cannon where you need them to fire and with what shell and there shouldn’t be a distance limit between you and the bots you have manning the guns.