There is absolutley zero incentive to play as allied. NONE. The weapons are horrid absolutley horrible. They should just delete the allied bit completly. What a joke.
1 Like
Sounds like a skill issue… 
All factions can be shite or good, it just depends on the team you’re playing with.
Sometimes you’re flush, sometimes you’re bust.
Welcome to the community, btw. 
6 Likes
lol allies are flooded with noobs 35% of the time. I just had a match where no one was building rally points for half the game until I called them out on it and towards the end everyone had around 100 engineer points ( I had built a rally point and when I had to respawn my rally point had 4 people waiting to spawn in lol) .
1 Like
What a horrid nation!
They only have:
-
Best BA in the game
-
Extremely decent and varied BR2+ SMGs
-
Solid AT weaponry
-
Best BR3 vehicle lineups in the game
-
One of the what BR3 semi auto selections
-
Best machine gun in BR3
-
Amazing if not best selection of event weaponry and vehicles
-
Best vehicle lineup in BR5
-
Second strongest infantry weaponry in BR5
Oh did I mention that only times their equipment is worse on BR3 and BR5 is when it’s compared to the Soviets, that they DO NOT FIGHT AGAINST?
Quite literally all you have to do is get past BR1 and skip BR4 (which is something I’d recommend doing on any nation) and you are playing one of the strongest nations there are
6 Likes
It’s only because all the skilled players went to Japan due to the latest update and event. Once the Japan craze goes away, Allies will become (good?) again. Or at least better than they are.
2 Likes
Having played a match as BRII Japan tonight, I can confirm that this statement isn’t entirely accurate.
1 Like
Keep dreaming there buddy
they will never be good unless the enemy team are fresh in a battle rating or if people leave because they got the wrong game mode. idk why they try so hard at losing its like a whole new skill they made up when it comes to defending any point
1 Like
Remember - just tell your Allied teammates this:
There’s Oil on the Point.
It creates a strange phenomenon like saying “Attack the D point”, and instantly rewards better teammates.
1 Like
Gotta love when skill issues are self reported so I don’t have to 
4 Likes
the dont deserve to know where the oil is with how poorly they play
2 Likes
Dreaming? He is literally correct.
Lee enfield has 10 rounds, bayonet, one of the fastest firerate and good sights plus can keep aiming while shooting. Literally everything you need for BA.
Bazookas are best br 2 at launchers and the m9 isnt bad either in br 3 due to fast reload.
Shermans have great armour and are nearly invulnerable to most br 2 tanks unlike panzer 4s with weak turret armour + they have apcbc shells now which onehsots almost everything. Also shermans have best 75mm HE in the game.
P51 d5 has nearly infinite supply of .50 cal rounds and the double 500 pound bombs decimate tigers and panzers. Also event Xa 38 is unfairly OP
m1a1 thompson with 30 round is br2 and they have tons of other br 2 premium thompsons
Johnosn rifle got downitiered and it is much better than g41. Also they got the battlepass winchester m1907 which has 20 rounds and mag fed in br3
Browning bar is accurate and highly mobile feeling like a br 5 assault rifle in br3
P47 has the best cas loadout in the entire game and meteor is superior to any other jet in the game. Superpershing is not bad either except the reload speed is kinda slow
Allies arent suffering with bad equipment but with bad playerbase that doesn’t know how to utilize these weapons. Still better than soviet players tho who bring mosins to br 5 since their t34 85 d5t got them uptiered
1 Like
I gave up playing level one or two as Allies quite a while ago, and only play Allies in level three and five. I do play level one and two Allies, but only in my own custom match games. If I want a decent level one or two match, I either play Germans or Soviets. That being said, I think I pointed out that after the Type 100 super turbo buff there would be less people wanting to play level one Allies.
I do on occasion play level one or two with my Japanese, which is almost always a seal clubbing victory, but I don’t like the Pacific maps so I don’t play Japanese much. 196 Japanese games played in 3.5 years. 
Actually it’s BR II. It had no place being downtiered. The Lanchester was well and truly enough for BR II.
It was a typo. I fixed it. And i agree that 30 round thompson is too much for br 2. If they want to have br 2 thompson it needs to be 20 round m1a1
2 Likes
It’s funny when the allies have the best and most beautiful weapons, not to mention the Russian bias.
See I completely agreed till the 4th point.
Soviets have the best BR3 vehicle lineup imo. But yes, Pz4’s vs Shermans is a good mix up in which the shermans are slightly better due to the lack of good AT performance at BR2. Stug 3F to BR2 when?
Garand is great but it should be the standard. The Gewher 41 absolute needs a buff though.
Thats just a straight up hot take, BAR is not the best MG at all, thats the MG34, and honestly I think the DP or DPM is better as well, Ke-7 is on par with the BAR.
True
Eh not really, super pershing is good, but doesnt beat the KTH or even the Ho Ri really, the Meteor is proper cracked though.
SF meta is cancerous is all I can say, though the Auto Hei and the soviet stuff is better, still great though, still cancerous.
Soviets have KV-1 that doesn’t fare well against uptiers, Sherman’s have better HE as well afaik. Sherman 105 also can overdoes Panthers with relative ease
Soviet attackers are mid. The best is probably the premium Yak-9K and it’s still strafing plane. P51-D5 is just better overall. XA-38 is busted broken, even better than quite a bit of BR4 attacker planes I’d say.
Grand has high damage, low reload speed but has 8 round magazine. However now Americans can choose Johnson with 10 bullets, 15.3 damage and still better reload than G41 and Type 4 Rifle
BAR is better due to mobility and ADS speed mostly, but it also gets less dispersion and less horizontal recoil that’s much harder to control. MG34 is better if you mount it due to the firerate and 50 round mag combo but you will spend more time running than mounted with the gun so BAR wins for better performance in a common situation
Super Pershing is definitely worse than KT. It’s worse HE slinger than Ho-Ri by a significant margin but has a turret, isn’t open top and has MGs to help it out. I’d say it’s worse than Ho-Ri, but it’s still pretty decent tank - especially considering it’s AT performance. However Meteor is beyond broken and P47 is simply broken
Type Hei has significantly lower damage compared to the T20. Recoil wise they are similar, Type Hei has 0.05 less dispersion and 10 rounds more. But it’s 13.9 damage with greater damage drop-off makes it stop 1 shotting enemies at distances of 21m, while T20 keeps up to 68m. So essentially Type Hei fighting at distances above 21m becomes 15 round and half RoF SF because your TTK gets increased tremendously and you need to use 2 bullets per enemy. Soviet AVT40(20) is better, probably the best gun in the game ATM. Too bad US doesn’t face Soviets so they can just shit on FG42 II with it’s excessive RoF
Good thing that BR4 basically doesnt exist for anyone, so until it does its not a great argument, Especially since by that metric, the germans have the best BR3 lineup since they are better at facing uptiers with the better penning guns.
But yeah the US Air lineup for BR3 is very strong, just because of the Mustang and grizzly honestly, but if the Mk9 Spit goes up like it should, you can include that there.
Yeah I dont full know why the Johnson went down, tbf I still dont use it because it doesnt really fit the mostly or semi historical lineups I use. Saying that, its still less OP than the SVT at least.
I mean yeah the BAR is great as a run and gun weapon, but its no better in that role than the SMGs you often see at that BR imo.
The MG34 truly fills its niche, and even hipfiring is extremely powerful, Id take it over any other BR3 MG in a heartbeat, honestly its better than the MG42 as well imo. Like even for room clearing, the MG34 is better, since if there is more than 4 people in the room, its unlikely your not stuck reloading the bar unlike the MG34.
The Meteor is broken for sure though, completely agree, all the jets are, but the Meteor takes the cake, I still dont know why they artificially buffed all their turning times so much???
As for SF’s, their all cancer, also ngl, with how fast the matches are, being at sub 21m is very common so its not that big of a difference. Though this is just arguing semantics at this point.
2 Likes