The real problem = players

I read about nerf this and nerf that because I died once and I am a noob and can’t do anything about it only than devs should nerf it. Well, if you nerf one thing something else will be the strongest weapon and people will use that weapon constantly until that weapon is nerf. People should stop about making suggestions about nerf and make suggestions that really matters. The dembombs are just fine. I am a pro gamer and people are already barely able to kill me in a tank with those bombs, if you nerf those bombs than I can guarantee you that my scores will be 200-0 kd. People are complaining they are OP. But in my games it seems I am almost the only one trying to take down tanks with the dembombs. The balance of weapons and vehicles etc is just fine. If they nerf the planes, the attacking team almost has no change. Look at games where no one uses airplanes, they will lose. You have to use every weapon and vehicle in the game to win and that’s a good thing.
The real problem in the game are

  1. Bad players. They are just bad and crying about everything. I only started 3 weeks ago and people were already complaining that Berlin would be unplayable because of the premium players benefitted ranks. Well, I have owned them all with my bolt action rifles.
  2. Bots are magnetic to enemy bombs. This is something that really should be fixed. It is also a solution to some who think dembombs are overpowered. At the moment my whole squad runs to the grenades and therefore the dembombs seem OP. If the squad would listen better to my commands and not run to the bombs, the killing with the bombs would drop drastically.
  • 3 as it seems in this forum, I am one of the few who uses engineer squads. Problem is when you build something, the squad is going on suicide mission. Devs should make them stand still when you are building. When my capture point is finished, more than half of my squad committed suicide by running to the enemy.
  • 4 too few real players in the game. Matches which are full of players are the matches where you really need all the weapons and vehicles available to win. I don’t know why I can’t play with PC anymore, but those matches were often full with players and more difficult than only console. Btw I am on ps5.
  • battle of Berlin invasion of ministry is unbalanced. Attacking team (Russians) will win this match 90% of the time. I see people arguing that Russians are OP. It’s not because of Russians or German weapons, but because of the map. I am German rank 26 in Berlin, most matches is 50\50 except invasion of ministry. Russians have ppsh, Germans have m42. There is not a big difference between the factions. Thereby, people are complaining about a games fraction, while irl there were also better weapons for one army to the next. Problem is not the weapons, problem is your lack of skills.
10 Likes

Couldn’t agree more… especially your last point. I have lost rounds where my team was basically having x2 the score more then the enemy but we kept spawning way to far and they just rushes the spawn before we got a chance to de-cap. I believe better spawns on some maps would make the Germans as good as the Soviets or even better(MG34/42 is leagues better then the ppsh on ranged shooting)

That’s true, there’s a lot of dumb players that build stupid fortifications and a lot of people don’t build rally points. If a point is being captured, there’s usually some guys sitting around the point that won’t actually go and clear the point.

a bit pretentious “I am the best” …
you are not the only one to use sappers, you are not the only one to use all kinds of units.

a pro who brags about being a pro by playing tank is a bit lol…

However we agree that most situations are due to the players and not because this or that thing is OP.

There are still some “unnamed” weapons or planes that need to be balanced.
e.g. a 5 star iL2 on moscow camp that has been set on fire 3 times should not fly as if it were intact.

But clearly the players are to blame for a lot of things, they just don’t want to admit it. It’s easier to ask for a nerf because they can have an impact on the forum.

However there are some nerfs that have improved the game, you say you started three weeks ago, so you haven’t experienced where there were as many arty circles as there were players on the map! and that every 30 seconds, the arty send time nerf has been a very good thing and also the fact that now if an arty is activated, the others have to wait.

You didn’t know either the planes which spawned at the same time as the infantry at the beginning of the game or of invasion which decimated everyone and one could do nothing, of the players who recover 30 kills to see more in less from the first 30 seconds was a nightmare. And gave too big an advantage to the defensive team

So yes the biggest problem comes from the players, but some things have to be balanced, after you pretend to be a pro player, playing tanks to kill bots, anyone can do it ^^, if you are sure of your level, there is the hard mode which will be more in your level, “the mod solo”

2 Likes

yes they should quit the nerf train u end up looking like butters from south park! if your going to whine nerf this why dont you play sarcastaball instead of enlisted then if u want all these nerfs

butters|250x141

I am a pro player in general. I am not a pro tank player. I think I am 90% on the first place. At the moment the game is too easy for me.

Like it was allraedy said on the forum the real reason of toxicity here is because I’ve seen a lot of players wanting a different product

Some people want a realistic, asymmetrical game

Some people want enlisted to be infantry-only

Some want Enlisted to be Infantry-thunder

Some want improved AI

Some want removed AI

Some want mirror gameplay (almost identical teams)

Some people want huge difference between teams

Some want Enlisted to be simulation like HLL

Some want it to be arcade like BF5

Some want it to be like Heroes and Generals (this old dog can still bite for sure as certain things and mechanics are best in the genre)

etc,etc,etc…

Toxicity is made because all of us have no idea what devs want to do with this game and how they want to balance it !
And then there is devs who try to cater to everyone , listen to community and respond to mass cringe of wehraboos getting blown up i !.
But that also doesnt work !

And yes playerbase is full of wehraboos and cringe bois who come here crying after first time they see their precius axis tanks are not so OP ! So we get overnerf hammer of everything back to oblivion and almoust total uselessness let alone fun !

5 Likes

well, how do you call those, who complain about axies bf 109 with 250kg bombs? first everyone cries about the OP Germans and thats ok, and now, if anyone complain any op thing, he is a werhaboo?
also the us tanks had no chance against the tiger at the normandy and france, so just change the pz4 with the tiger1

not unless u want perishing every where

Unacceptable posts cleaned up.

Do not continue this personal & rule breaking debate here. This is your warning.

Please dont kill me mr mod

I believe public stat tracking linked to forum accounts should be a thing. Dont actually contribute to the points and instead camp like a little rat? Opinion THOUROUGHLY discarded!

3 Likes

I’m gonna read all of your stats, Lego. Every. Last. One.

2 Likes

Except I’m actually decent at the game…

Compared to me, you aren’t. Stinky winky binky!

really

1 Like

well, no, the pershing were use at Febr. 1945, the first fight by a pershing were near cologne, especially esldorf and were destroyed by a tiger 1.

so if we have a rhein-campaign, there could be some pershing but in the normandy, especially at D-Day and days/weeks followed, there werent any pershings in europe.

dont matter to me i still want perishing to kill tiger if u get tiger

well, dont matter, than i want my leopard 2 a7

good luck with that

Your 200-0 tank kd could easily be fixed by not letting tanks shoot from the grey zone. Tanks are otherwise fine, they can be countered without too much trouble as long as they are not abusing the zone.

That’s not how tanks work. Similarly, it’s like forcing riflemen to fight in close range because pistol bullets can’t get them at long range.