I wonder why wont they just make the game itself paid
I dont know why people need Stalingrad to realize the aggressive monetization of the devs.
Were the overpriced and useless CBTs not clear enough?
Maybe the Premium Panzer IV in Moscow which has HEAT? The Firefly? The 5 men MG squad? Nah.
Comparing SG with CBTs is also interesting. At least Stalingrad bundle has some advantages. Im yet to see the advantages of the CBTs apart from the engie biker for Africa (thanks to engineer being locked to level 9 idk). I would even call CBTs scam.
Otherwise I dont really care. Free Stalingrad stuff is okay. The tanks are fine, you get the best SMG ingame (thanks to Russians) and decent bombers. Only Germans suffer due to bugged MG34.
1 Like
I think was clear from 50€ for a tank with a skin wo dont give you advantage but instead is outclassed by free one
What is important are the premium squads in SG as many people understood the devs that they wont introduce them thanks to vague statements.
Well, not exactly.
Ofc not, infact I was suggesting keeping stalingrad entirely for paying customers to avoid the ridiculous P2W it was supposed to be.
Well I dont exactly demand anything. I simply pointed out that for F2P game like this that doesnt have a massive playerbase such P2W content as stalingrad was supposed to be would shrink the already rather small playerbase even smaller.
Well lets say enlisted turned into P2P, something like 7-10e / Month which would be about the same as current premium / season pass / what ever it is.
Definitely not too much anyway, would I pay it ? No. Would majority pay it that currently aint paying for the game ? Probably not.
I dont mind paying customers getting certain advantages, more exp ( faster progress )
more available squads ingame, even the premium moscow LMG squad that was supposed to be so OP that it breaks the balance even in normandy is fine.
As it really isnt as OP as certain ppl said it to be.
But the sorry fact is that this game most likely wont survive as P2W or P2P.
1 Like
I wont pay it, because the game is a live service and make you always keep spend money, for premium,battlepass and other shit dev can trow us
1 Like
I have bought the pass, and even if I didn’t I see no p2w there.
Judging by the overall skillbase of enlisted playerbase, everything is p2w.
Anyway. Stalingrad is amazing. I regret nothing. It’s by far the most underrated campaign in the game.
It just needs more maps. Just that. Just maps.
Alies are strong as fk, probably my fav side to play on.
Axis are fun, but not as rewarding to play as soviets.
It has a healthy playerbase of humans even tho must are average.
I would argue that for a month or so, Stalingrad is even more populated than normandy based only on eye witness. (witch isn’t a way to judge or argue but what ever)
Still… The most underrated campaign in-game that’s trully worth to play on.
I can argue easily that soviets are far better there than axis, and no mkb will be enough
Tldr:Stalingrad judging by playercount imo wasn’t a fail. Far from it. And if they introduce pacific on the same basis I would be pleased.
Me neither. Not only because I dont play the game just that much that id pay for it regardless how cheap the price would be.
But more due to direction of development of the game or lack of it.
2 Likes
Fg42 with granade luncher then
Wouldn’t change a single thing.
Stalingrad Avt it’s by far the best weapon ingame right now.
Damage, control, ammo count, soldiers that can be equiped on.
Avt40 on Stalingrad > fg42 II in berlin.
Not a single reason to go either way
Imo, and as a player that play daily, owns everything and do play every campaign, avt40 is the best weapon hands down.
Avt40
I have edited mean time. Was phone auto correction. 
Even tho I can easily argue that sniper avs in Stalingrad is far better in my eyes than the mkb.
What killed the experience for. Most Stalingrad players imo was the Flux of good players early on in the axis side, that isn’t present no more. Right now. Most batles are somehow on the sameground. And the soviet power there is more than recognized on small arms.
Planes are worthless overall there. And tanks are tnt magnets.
Dude dont say this in the forum you get eaten alive, i still prefer the pps42 on the avs in stalingrad i dont feel i need more with soviet
1 Like
Personal opinion 
The fully upgraded 14 damage 1 shot kill avs, precise, will eat mkb snipers for breakfast.
1 Like
Even better than G43K?
I can easily argue yes. Current Stalingrad Avt40 is better than single use berlin or normandy g43 Kurz. (or dual on transfer.)
Just by 100 rounds or so using it against 800 or so in berlin.
Ironically, I remember the Soviet mains crying about the Mkb being too good/ OP and they refused to play the Soviets. Even the KV wasnt good enough despite being the sole tank where I managed to survive 10+ tnt and deathpack charges.
1 Like
i know.
they still dont know a single one on driver hatch is enough
ups 
1 Like
Not exactly self-explanatory considering you could sink yamato with close miss while you require some what precise hit in order to take out stalinium coated soviet tank.
