Should have focused on this part
He knows rational thought isn’t your strong suit so you two are even.
Also: there’s always an analogue for any weapon, you just have to dig far enough. Also: where the fuck is KP31 drum?
First of all theres plenty of “inaccurated” weapons in places where they shouldnt be
2nd the actual guns are inaccurated due to lovely dispersion.
3rd only “accurate” thing about the guns and theyr performance is probably the name of the weapons.
We really need to ban ESLs from this forum
Maybe if you search a bit what weapon or veichle was or not used historically in the game campaign you can understand that an ak47 in korea is decisive more historically accurate than the fedorov in berlin
But yes im stupid
I didn’t like the addition in Berlin either but it isn’t difficult to see that it was done because of the general consensus that small arms were heavily in favor of Germany with the FG-42 II and because the Soviets didn’t have anything analogous with the MP/43 it was added alongside.
My issue with the early AK47 being added to Korea is that it was never there AND you’re not adding it compete with another equivalent weapon, and then you just create the problem for yourself where you need to give the Coalition forces some sort of assault rifle that they didn’t use either.
ZH-29 or FNAB were never in Tunisia, still they are there. I see your point of view, but devs dont care, was that weapon made in that year? It was, soo they will add it.
Trhee example again
Pz3b never used in moscow
Zk29 never used in tunisia
Rd44 never used in berlin
EM2
BSA28P
CAEM1950
You really, REALLY need a stronger grasp on the English language before you try to argue with people here.
For the third time, it is these two reasons TOGETHER that have not been done in-game before… You don’t have to add an assault rifle that wasn’t present to balance against another assault rifle that also wasn’t present.
Mkb and Fedorov are prime examples why they will do it, because they are just those things you just said.
For the 7th time
You can rant, but if we get korea we get the AK the Rpd and some western stg44 child
AND PLUS
You can not play it so…
Despite what people here like to say Moscow has clearly evolved into the general Northern half of the Eastern Front, including weapons in the battle for Leningrad and featuring premium and gold order weapons referencing the Finns.
Cant wait for the battle of leningrad campaign this year for see kt2 vs t60 because it ended in 1944
Well, no, they just add everything that was made in 1942. Fins weapons are there to sell premiums, because if it was northern front, i don’t see why Finnish weapons shoudn’t come with Finnish squads.
See man, i said my part, there is nothing more i can say. Only time will prove who is wrong and who is right, soo now we can only wait for that campaign IF it will come in future.
Didn’t Germans get a Finnish Mosin squad
They have Finnish Mosins, squad is German.
Dont forget They have even a suomi squad german
Yes I was speaking of their equipment.
Oh right, in Stalingrad, absolutely forgot about that one.
But Finnish equipment is even in Stalingrad, so that doesnt indicates anything.
Especialy in division that was parth of Army group south whole time.
Yeah, definetly because of balance…
M2 - Not handed out during 44 and primary Pacific
Jumbo - Reached Europe after Overlord
T50 - Was used in Leningrad only
Fed Avtom - Crap gun that was most likely removed etc. after Winter War, but definitly no point in Berlin
AVS - Gun already withdrawn after Winter War, nener used in Berlin
Mkb - Never used in Moscow and questionable in SG
Avtom - Probably scrapped by Berlin and soldier were not allowed to use the gun auto
F2 - Never used in Moscow
A13 - Already scrapped by Tunisia
ZB-26 - Primary a SS gun
Beretta M1 - Proto
Ita SA - Proto
OVP - Scrapped before Tunisia
RD - Proto, no reason to be main grand
ZK - Another SS gun
Semo - Outdated model
Panzer III B - Scrapped after invasion of Poland
ZH - Never used by the Wehrmacht, at best by SS units
Grb - Not used in Moscow
G41 - Not used in Mosvow
FG42 - Not a allrounder rifle but a paratrooper gun
Bazooka M1 - Not used in Normandy
PzB38 - No sense in Tunisia
Beretta M1918 - No point in Normandy
FNAB - Not in Tunisia and doubt it was used by the Germans (in Normandy)
Just imagine what alternatives the devs could have instead of using the Panzer B?
Is pure lazyiness.
This reason of balance is just dumb because its 50/50 that the not historical stuff makes balance worse.
Yeah, because the Soviets would suffer otherwise. They just have better MGs and drums we all know drums are bad and MP40 deals 0.2 more dmg.
(Also Soviets used captured StG en masse so pointless).