not really since the most advance we have in berlin is RPD, with korea being able to have the m3 carbine, m2 carbine, AKs, main battle tanks such as centurions, t-54, and m47 with experimental stuff such as the british EM-2 bullpup rifle, and amx-13; and that’s just the active fighting phase since it’s still an ongoing war as no peace treaty was signed
1 Like
The AKM was not used until 1959 and as such was not in the Korean War. The EM-2 was adopted and then “very shortly thereafter” the decision was overturned due to NATO and caliber standardization, it would not be fitting as anything more than gold orders/a premium squad. The M3 Carbine is literally just an M2 Carbine with an active infrared scope system.
Tanks would be more advanced but I was mostly referring to small arms being generally inferior to what we would find in the Berlin campaign.
I wasn’t talking about the AKM, i was talking about the 1949 variant of the AK which would been in soviet service at that time. the EM-2 would fit in especially consider we have the japs which is 90% experiment shit never fielded, there is also Fedorov which was pulled out before russia even entered the second world war; and again the korean war is still a war that goes onto this day with the latest peace attempt being in 2019
1 Like
Soviet service, but not Chinese or North Vietnamese service. The Fedorov likewise was most definitely not used in Korea. The EM-2 is not really comparable with experimental Japanese weaponry because the Japanese really needed them for in-game parity. There is no parity required here as neither side used assault rifles.
soviets had pilots in korea so the devs will use that to justify the inclusion of AKs into it. never said federov was in korea, with me pointing out that federov wasn’t in service in 1941 and was absolutely pulled out by 1945 yet both moscow and berlin has it
And it really shouldn’t have been included in either. I’m not sure them desperately reaching into the past to give Soviets an edge would correlate with them giving the Koreans a weapon they never had.
Polish campaign is a nice idea, though i wonder how polish troops would counter various STG types.
1 Like
As a Pole myself, I see no point in such a campaign at this state of game development.
I see the Polish campaign only as a event, just as the “Modern conflict event” was done, but as some cyclicality, and developed sometimes a bit, after each cycle.
Small but interesting operations or single battles, such as “First Soviet-Finnish War”, “Operation Bagration”, “Battle of the Bulge”, etc. should work the same way, only with some special uniforms and weapons made for them, to make it playable.
In the form of an event you can do anything, from “Invasion of Poland” to “Warsaw Uprising”, programmed historically accurate, and no one will complain that the player base is spreading, and someone has to grind mp40 for the fifth time.
1 Like
Like that any time in history of game stoped developers from adding weapons that those nations never even adopted.
1 Like
I just don’t think they would take such an iconic weapon which wasn’t used and attribute it to a campaign in which it would be THE weapon AND it wouldn’t even have an obvious equivalent to oppose it.
They did it already, they dont care. AK will sell the campaign to many people, soo they will add it there whenever you like it or nor, it is sad, but that just a fact.
No they haven’t.
Mkb in Moscow? When they were tested after end of battle and in Leningrad area iirc.
So an AK in North Korean army is no problem, that weapon will sell that campaign, and thats all that matters.
1 Like
True, i dont understand wy people keep spam “historical accurate” as argoument, it make me think if those people play the same game as us
2 Likes
And it saw it’s equivalent with the Fedorov.
That didnt needed to be there either.
1 Like
The last sample of Fedorovs was destroyed,captured or simply lost after that joke of invasion aganaist the finland, so…
Panzer3b out of service, mkb and t50 was in leningrad,m2 in pacific,beretta1918 in tunisia,ovp1918 scrapped after the 1936,springfield was issued only for marines,rd44 and as44 still in testing, berettaM1 never used, zk29 never used in tunisia, Armaguerra.M39 prototype, half of japanese equipment are prototype
So…
Ak47 is totally historical accurate in korea
2 Likes
Not entirely true. They issued later models to second line forces in Europe and Africa as well.
1 Like
I know English isn’t your strong suit, but I said they’ve never added weapons that were inaccurate AND didn’t have anything they would be analogous with.
Lol yes yes