The faction trend problem

Mess Room
41

And how else are you going to do that?
If you make it years wise, you will let people face T-34 and zombie Feds and AVSs with Panzer IV Es and MP40s and we already had this and it wasnt pleasant and healthy.
I mean, just look at Veekays drama not have one freaking gun in SG and now try to do that with other stuff while trying to make the game balanced/ healthy for both sides.

Anyway, War Thunder has CW and Modern dsy stuff additionally to their WW2 era stuff.
Enlisted at best has three eras of WW2 so I doubt it will be on the same level assuming there are enough players to fill all BR ranges which is something, high BRs in WT struggle with because people dont own a Abraham or are too poor to use it because of WTs glorious economy system.

Which is why its performance-based.

Historically, Federov shouldnt be in the game or at least not as an grind gun but the devs settled it by firstly putting it into the worst campaign lore-wise.

Not with the current buggy tank gameplay I guess.
At least I doubt that it wont suffer from same bugs as the IS-2.

42

The whole view should be shattered if you see German bombers over Berlin 1945 (or bombers in general as its pretty dumb to wage an bomber air raid over the frontline where your own troops are) or the spam of flamethrowers and SMGs and ARs of nations who didnt have SmG platoons.

1 Like
43

Its good yes, but the tiny mag really kills it especially with the horrendously goofed dispersion for any gun that isn’t a boltaction

1 Like
44

Well we could have low br early war gear and low vr late war gear. For example:
MP28 early war, MP3008 late war
Sten Gun both early and late
M50 reising early war and greasegun late war
PPD box mag early war and PPS 42 late war
Not to mention the equipment that served the entire war such as kar98k, mosin, type 38, mp38/40, lee enfield etc.

45

Nah, dispersion is fucked on many weapons especially LMGs, to the point of making them unusable at range even when prone and mounting

1 Like
46

Yeah, that doesn’t sound bad.
Except then we’re splitting up the player base not just between BR but also between early and late war and the whole merge is supposed to be about fusing the playerbase together.

47

To be honest Pacific is a joke when it comes to building rallies. There are so few good spots on most maps that a single player can clear them all. (Some maps in Moscow also suffer this problem)
You’d need half of the team to constantly keep rebuilding them AND to keep running at the cap zone just to push back the rally killers. Meanwhile half of the team is 500m away on a hill getting a kill a minute

1 Like
48

M2 is like the best SMG in the game lol

1 Like
49

But the Hei is inherently incredibly inaccurate compared to basically any other semiauto in the game

50

I really think you are right that the Pacific is not a very fun map to begin with…
Stalingrad and Berlin are very fun.

51

only if you can hipfire them
i prefer aiming down sight weapons

52

Well then they need to pick low and high br gear for both early and late war, so we don’t se mp3008 in moscow and late pattern type 99 on guadalcanal

53

I don’t know any trends i have never played allies. If i dont count lower than 1% of total matches.
I can see that there is some fluctuation or movement between faction time to time but i have not seen any problems.

Even the winning odds clearly change i usually manage to win.
Sometimes need is to carry harder than normal, thats my advice.