That has nothing to do with the current topic.
but since you did answer that , alow me to state my point of view.
They don’t own us nothing. And it’s in their interest to provide a game with the least number of bugs.
But development time, what’s important right now, or what’s in the deadline to be updated, or if they currently have the resources/time/man power to do so, or, how easy said fix can be done its far from our reach
We cant know, or we will never know, how many code lines or parameters they have to change just for a bomb splash damage from a plane.
For us it’s always a matter of changing numbers, for them, can be countless hours of multiple code lines that can interfere with other parts of the game. So development time takes time. Alot.
We will never know, coz none of us are currently developing a game. We are just enjoying a product they deliver.
All we can do is report the bugs as they come and provide proper info how to reproduce them so they can fix them.
I m satisfied by the current fixes and game changes so far. But that might be just me.
If you notice the Russian side of enlisted foruns have more priority, you can always translate your bug report (if done correctly with current “how to report a bug”).
I notice the same lack of comunication both sides. Doesn’t mean I m asking for them to communicate more. But the overall croundfund to this game was around the basis of community feedback to make the game we want to play. Not what they want to sell.
For example, on croundfund we had the option to vote for the next campaign after normandy and Moscow, weoted for Stalingrad after Moscow and normandy, but, we did get berlin and will get Tunisia first.
This change of commitments, plane op bombs, and the fact that premium squads are inferior to any non premium counter parts are the only issues I have.
I had reported all of them, I wasn’t expecting a dev answer, and in fact, I got none.
But that ship, sailed long time ago.