Ehm Yes. If Df would remove shovels, it wouldnt change the world. No one would care as at best 14% would care and battles wouldnt be affected at all. It wouldnt affect the “greater good”. The same goes vice versa. Just imagine, DF never introduced them. The battles would be the same as rn where we have shovels but no one uses them (Sry where enough people use it so 14% of the matches have a hole)
= Useless, and irrelevant to 99% of the players and the overall “greater good”/ game-flow. Its pure “fun”-goodie but you wont win/ lose battles with it in almost all cases. And I dont see any problems calling them useless, but fun to use.
Now imagine they have the brilliant idea and remove engineers or even just the spawn beacons.
tell you that much, shovels got introduced becaused people asked for those.
devs went a point ahead and actually implemented a digging mechanic.
now, i don’t claim to be a mastermind, but doesn’t really care if you think it’s usefull or not. yet those got introduced. so i hardly think they will remove something that they have implemented.
matter of fact, as a alpha tester my self, that rarely happened.
beside, those will be eventually even more usefull in pve.
but that’s fine. the likes of you doesn’t really like to think out of the box nor for the future.
( btw, still, you can’t really use the " uSeLEEss " argument when it’s subjective for you. again)
just like " NOOOOOOO BAS TOO OP "
( although it goes also the way around. take as example inaccuracies or the fg42 available for everyone despite everyone asking to be limited )
But how many?
And I also like to remember that no one asked for SA nerfs yet they came. Do you think the devs consider our feedback most of the time?
I ve heard Moscow Allies is pretty good testing ground for PvE.
Anyway I cant argue here so you are right I guess.
The future is that the P-38 is stil bugged and before we got PvE, we get engineers for old prem squads and a fifth free slot.
Anyway I am not against APCs (heck I even made suggestions in your APC thread) or shovels but rn they are a (predicted) desaster or just a gimmick. Tunisia could have been a good testing ground for APCs but DF failed Tunisia and I also dont wanna have new campaigns.
and you can pretty much find it for your self the answer:
who knoes.
i kinda wish for the latters. but we’ll see
well, which comes something that i didn’t mentioned before, but it’s not necessarely a bad thing. which works for having different stuff within the game and not being forced to play with always the same stuff over and over.
choise is good despite what many others claim.
guess we’ll have to stick around and find out.
V
if you consider your self a normal player, than i’m glad to be a different one.
guess you’ll have to deal with the fact that it’s a game for everyone.
( and you aren’t a creator. so ““useless”” stuff will remain, and other so ““useless”” halftracks gets introduced within each update. with this one, we got even two new halftracks lmaooo we’re in the streak of 4 halftracks in total in just 3 updates 4 time the charm? )
well, i’d be of the opinion of limiting it’s angles instead.
but then those would be somewhat powerfull on maps with different type of heights level ( such as normandy D-day, moscow quarry, and a few others in tunisia that would give a good advanatage despite having this said elevation fixed. although, would be only 6 maps out of 30 )
but idk.
i guess nerfing the damage would also be an option.
but then would do piss damage against airplanes. since, as far as i know, it only has one type of damage. ( but i could be wrong )
Sorry to rehash, but the word “Jap” is considered the worst level of racial slander in Japan.
There was once an incident in Japan where an Australian was stabbed to death because he was mistakenly thought to have said “Jap”.
The referendum for call your country in another way wen?
Sorry i have to say it, jap is the most common abbreviation to japan in the euroasiatic contenent, Africa and south america and is used daily, for our point of wiew jap is only an abbreviation like fra,ita,ger, so lest the other half of the world problem remain on the other half of the world