The Enlisted Coexisting Weapons Treaty of 2024

Alright buddy, I know nothing about the context of this argument here seeing as I have the other guy permanently muted, but there are inaccuracies and missing contexts in your comment here and I want to help correct em

A: Allies is WWII. NATO is 1949. Considering what nations formed NATO, it ain’t too incorrect to interchange them, but still there is a difference. Now, as for weapons based on “the NATO round,” I’m gonna assume you mean 7.62x51mm NATO. Also known as .308 Winchester. Which yes NATO’s Cold War Battle Rifles were made for that caliber

M14 is chambered in 7.62x51mm NATO. This is a modern full power rifle caliber round. The M14 is not, nor ever will be, classified as an Assault Rifle. The M14 is a Battle Rifle, and its modern iteration, the M14 EBR, is most commonly used as a Designated Marksman Rifle. Believe it or not when you take the M14 out of the jungle and put a scope on it, it’s a really darn good rifle still used today

I agree. Such examples like calling a Battle Rifle an Assault Rifle

It’s called shoot the sucker down. You have 20mm and 30mm cannons on your 109’s. Use em

All I want’s my 90mm and 3”

They have the P-47 and the Corsair so they don’t need the Super Pershing using your argument

Look, I want the Super Pershing cause it’s really, REALLY cool and it makes me feel some sorta way. That and it is literally the analogue to the Tiger II. In all honesty, a well placed shot from a Pz III will kill it, and the Tiger II is still more or less a point and click adventure game when shooting at it

Your counterpart to the P-47 and Corsair is the Bf 110. It’s not really analogous, but it’s the German rocket plane. If you want something more analogous to the P-47 or Corsair, then start asking for something. I’m sure you have some plane that carried 6-10 rockets, and maybe one that can carry 4-10 and a bomb. Just ask for it and provide the necessary details and sources just as we did for the Super Pershing. Ain’t that hard. Just be prepared to wait 5 years for it to be implemented

Well the super Pershing saw combat lol using YOURE ARGUMENT Lmfao diabolical

The Me 262 is the same and every time it is mentioned to add it the Allies/Soviets cry that it will cause an imbalance.

Yeah I wouldn’t mind seeing a split second of it zipping through the sky and doing a 30 second turn so it does the same thing while hogging a vital spot lmfao

But if it does get added it would definitely need a speed reduction since it’s a jet

Its speed does not have to be reduced at all, it is an advantage for being a jet plane.

Like why ?
Both jet’s & maus are necessary because identity, HA and probably some other silly reason.

Im pretty sure that never saw combat but for the jet the reason why is cause you would barely be able to destroy tanks and stuff since you fly right by and would be lucky to even get a hit lol

It might have seen combat.
Which is more than t20 or rd44.
And they planned mass production for it, which was one of the “silly” arguments.

Np, it can have same mid-air parking abilities as il2 has, artificial balancing.

Also very identy something.

1 Like

Bro screw the mass production crap it has to see combat to be in the game but the snail obviously doesn’t care and just wants an equal equipment on each side except the Soviets just get a little bit of the good stuff sometimes

And for the Maus it may have but even people need photos or links and plus it would need something to kill it other then planes so it’s never gonna be a thing in enlisted BUT the me262 might be a thing tho

Alright but I mean isn’t there other variants that have a slower speed cause if it does come I would want to kill tanks with it lol and plus you got like a million of photos these jets I never even heard of before

It was more of a reference to earlier poster who used this “silly” argument.

I can live with this.
Thus, even less reasons to not grant PPsh to german TT, which is the subject of topic.

Yeah I don’t blame you but I think that they’re trying to be different then other WW2 FPS shooter games but they really don’t care for historical accuracy but overall they should have a historical battle modes tho in the future if this games gets very popular like war Thunder

And for German TT ppsh I mean I have it it’s kinda OP but not much as Russian one but tbh I don’t mind it being added since we have yalls Panzerfausts but the snail hates y’all german Mains for whatever reason lol

Personally I dont like Major Faction weapons being available as captured weapons in tech tree. (same goes for prototypes and unused weapons/equipment)

The odd event, premium or gold order is okay, but not the tech tree.

If you want to use said weapon, play said faction. thats it

3 Likes

??? You do realise that when it comes to having access to the most Iconic gear of other nations, Soviets win hands down. Poor Allies/commonwealth dont even get some of this stuff

  • Valentine
  • lee
  • Lewis
  • Thompson 100
  • P-40
  • Aircobra
  • A20 Boston
  • Hurricane
  • M4A2
  • M3A1 Halftrack
  • Panzerfaust
  • MP 40
  • Breda MG
  • Ariska type 38 Carbine
  • Bazooka
  • Chauchat
  • Mauser C96
  • Browning High power
5 Likes

Yes, thank you for the catch. It has been corrected now.

1 Like

Rommel

This thread was made by a Soviet main…

3 Likes