normal SMG velocity is around 400 m/s while 45.acp (Thompson, M3 Grease gun, M50 Reising) has 265 m/s which isnt terrible, it just takes getting used to.
Thompsons main flaw in my opinion is recoil, on the other hand Thompsons deal the highest damage out of all SMGs, have less than average dispersion and have significantly less damage decrease over distance than any other SMG, its more in line with ARs than submachine guns.
Well, definitely not Thompsons. Except maybe the premium 100 round.
But I am too lazy to come up with best smgs for each BRs 3-5.
For example Japanese and Soviet smgs are much more pleasant to play for me personally.
But I definitely have a lot of experience with Thompsons. I literally have one fully maxed out squad for every Thompson variant. Including BSA Thompson.
you could have picked Király, Cönders, Tokyo Arsenal or LAD but 100 round 1928 Thompson is probably the most overpowered at least until M1921/28 gets unlocked.
Well, I will always prefer AR over smgs at BR5. I use BR5 smga only for vehicle crews.
So I don’t see the proper relevancy there.
And for BR3/4 Thompsons, each BR has shit Thompson and pretty decent one.
The good ones are M21/28 Thompson and M1928A1 Thompson. The other two were pretty underwhelming.
But no Thompson is my favorite smgs on any BR.
For BR3, the smgs I like more are TZ-45, Suomi, Type 100 late, ppsh 41 box (even with fixed dispersion somewhere in future), mp 41 r.
And for BR4, I prefer all Japanese Smgs (they’re are just extremely satisfying to use).
fair, but we were talking about the best SMG.
Submachine guns are obviously less versatile than assault rifles.
Though I still use Király43M and Cönders, ppsh41 on BR5. (with assaulter/medic)
Im also using Thompson 1928A1 50 and Tokyo Arsenal but neither the US or Japan have ARs so I wounder if I would still use those if they had ARs.
His argument for the alllies being the best faction in the game is that the Thompsons are the best smgs. (Which I personally don’t think so. But ok, that’s debatable). Or at least he didn’t mention any other.
Anyway, that’s why I always mentioned ARs. I don’t see that much importance in BR5 smgs. Since I personally will always prefer AR gameplay.
I might also mention the lack of penetration of the AŤ weapon (even after buff) compared to the Germans/Soviets.
Or the absolutely awful late game snipers compared to the Germans/Soviets.
The inferior late mortar compared to the Germans/Soviets. Worse tanks compared to the Germans/Soviets.
They don’t have an AR compared to the Germans/Soviets (although that role can be sort of replaced by m2c that’s available for nearly all classes)
I’m pretty sure FG42 series is fixed it was never nerfed after the update and the avs needed the buff like the fg42 series lil bro idk what rock you be living under but you gotta come out and open your eyes
lol… second worst tanks, worst AT gun and AT rocket launcher(alongside japan), worst SMG(thompsons are shit compared to alternatives in other faction).
Bro is talking about cringe with a n#z! Girl as pfp
And what about the rest??? Probably i get wrong in submachine guns?
What about the AT rifles??
Or tanks?
Yeah the planes are OP but GE also have decent planes as attackers and figthers
(Edit:) AT guns are nasty
Look at US the only way to reach GE level is purshasing premium squads as the calliope, paratroopers, or using some event weapons as the stinger other way is hard to face GE
(Exceptly if they are skilled)