And so I thought about the Battle of Kursk in our game and . . . two tanks on each side in the Battle of Prokhorovka? Sounds like cringe. If Kursk is going to happen, then it needs to be made into some kind of experimental campaign with at least twice as many tanks. Or even with a proportionally increased number of players. Or even with the formula 15 players - 5 tanks. I don’t know.
1 Like
Thats exactly what we came up with in the post i linked above 
Been wanting to expand for a while now
1 Like
It is not very convenient to read large volumes of text at this moment 
1 Like
I don’t think Germany’s victory in the game’s battles is unhistorical. After all, every battle in Enlisted is a small part of a larger campaign, and Germany has had small victories in each battle.
1 Like
surprisingly I can agree with you on at least something. If they introduce Kursk it will be another map for tankers and pilots, that is, another map that I will be leaving
It is true that this game is a microscopic war (it would be cool if we had larger battles and more players) but it’s always fun and a blast anyway.
Kursk in this game wouldn’t do the real tank battle any justice, but that doesn’t matter. What matters is the idea.
It’s about representing the battle. Sure there’s only going to be 4 tanks on the battlefield but it’s about the idea of feeeeeeling like you’re fighting in this battle. You’d feel like you’re fighting in the Battle of Kursk where both sides threw everything into the meat grinder, where Germany first tested its latest toys the Tiger and Panther, where this battle would decide the fate of the Eastern Front
So every single battle of the war should be added. It’s wrong to say they shouldn’t