The balance of the rate of fire MKB 42 (stormtrooper)

Good afternoon! Today I wanted to raise the topic of the strange rate of fire of the assault version of the MKB 42.
In our game, the first MKB 42 was a variant of a sniper weapon, with a rate of fire of 650 rounds per minute. This was the answer to the terrible Beretta submachine gun with 20 rounds against the ppsh 41 with 71 rounds. It’s a stretch to understand the asymmetric balance as it is, but then the turnover showed a strange result.
After the addition of the MKB 42 to attack aircraft, it, like the weapons of Stalingrad, had understated tactical characteristics. 500 rate of fire, for assault weapons, sucks. However, it was for engineers, and to have a whole squad of shovels in the best traditions of Coh2 (who understood, he will understand) with excellent characteristics would be strange. In addition, in Stalingrad, even the MP 40 had a lower rate of fire, therefore, therefore, there were few questions, a test site.
Questions appeared when the weapons went to Moscow.
This weapon was transferred to Moscow with the same characteristics as the Fedorov machine gun (competitor MP 43) and I do not understand why it does not have a logical rate of fire, 550 rounds per minute.
This is a sniper MKb 42 sniper, with basic characteristics.


This is a modified version.

The weapon is in the basic configuration, has a high rate of fire, 650 shots (stg 44) in full (710), similar to the AR 15.
And this is an assault version of the MKB 42.

500 rate of fire, 150 below the sniper MKB 42. Why? A sight? Funny. Better materials? Why would snipers need a rifle with a high rate of fire if they are long-range fighters?
OK, OK then let’s get off the progression.
We have MKB 42, MP 43, STG 44. mp 43- 600 rounds per minute, STG 44- 650 rounds per minute. Each new weapon, after “modification” gets the coveted 50 fire rate. Question. Why is there a difference of 100 fire rate between mkb 42 and mp 43?



Logically it looks like this, mkb 42 (assault) 550 shots per minute, mp 43 600 shots per minute, stg 44 650 shots per minute. It has the logic that we have now. At the moment, the sniper version of 1942 surpasses the characteristics of 3 types of weapons at once, this is strange. There is no explanation why the Germans again lowered the rate of fire in order to raise it again in 1944 after renaming the weapon!
The mkb 42 (assault) balance is stupid. This is the peak of the stormtrooper’s assault potential, in theory, combining the best characteristics. And we don’t have them! This is literally a ruskin MP 40, with higher damage and firing range, against Fedorov with a 600 rate of fire! MkB 42 is terrible in the assault, he does not have time to fire his magazine, because of the low rate of fire. He’s got a nerf of precision, and he’s shaking. He is literally garbage, against the background of Kiray m 39. It’s stupid and unfair.

My suggestion is simple, give mkb 42 (assault variant) 550 rate of fire. This will not break the balance, will allow the weapon to be playable up close, will give a logical explanation for the further development of assault rifles in Germany, will make it possible to use it more often.
Thanks for your attention!

12 Likes

I dont care much about the fire rate. The thing should just get BAR accuracy. This thing is less accurate than a MG, debatable on par with the MP38.

Also no Mkbs in Moscow pls.

10 Likes

The snipe variant is “different” enlisted story with sniper weapon is harsh with strong emotional damage

Dont mind about it, one day they make both rof at 520

You keep saying the MP38 is better than the MP40 in moscow

Why is that?

Because the MP40 does 7.0 while the MP38 does 6.8. And The reload is faster of the MP40

MP38 is notable more accurate and iirc they didnt change this. Compared to this, 0.2 dmg difference is a joke.

Less dispersion

Got it

Rof does not matter much to me.

For the scoped variant: as is, it’s great in cqb. Lower the rof, it will become even better at long range.

Would be neither a nerf nor a buff…

For the assaulter variant: I could use a +50 rof I suppose… but like others mentioned, I’d rather have less (much less) dispersion with them instead. And or less damage drop over distance to make it compete with fedov, but that’s wishful thinking.

Mp38 is also one star less I believe. Makes it much cheaper to upgrade than mp40. Mp38 is a better “quality / price” weapon than mp40.

Like in Tunisia, first and second beretta smg. M1 beretta is better because of how cheap it is to max out, yet being almost as good as the second beretta already.

1 Like

Yeah. Some people only aim for level 3 guns until they find out half of them are nerfed or At rifle grenades.
MP35/1 is state-wise one of the best Axis SMGs, yet I rarely see it.
Its kinda ugly though and historical-wise on MP28 level.

1 Like

I spammed it in Berlin and Moscow before. Had better rof, more damage, and was stable.

Then they messed up all cartridges damage values and made mp40 almost as powerful as mp35… I get why ppl stopped using it. It became a sidegrade that costs more to upgrade…

Type 100 4 star have better stats than the stock stg44 :rofl:

Stat wise it might be the best

but in reality it isnt.

Long reload, sideways mag - less FOV, bad sights

And this

So high level weapons have nerfed performance to ballance them against low level weapons because they are just as common.
If we only knew, maybe we wouldn’t let this happen.

no…

reason being, it’s much better to ““limit”” a stronger weapons by giving it to smaller squads (such as the sniper squad in question ).

having potentially 7/8 mkbs with 550 of rate of fire truly is a pain in the ass on the oppositing end.

hence, that’s why the more available to many classes mkb is slighlty “”“worse”"" ( and i use losely that statement because you truly don’t need such high rate of fire with the mkb )

Sight is taste and at least the mag doesnt really affect me but each to own.

Fair enough

Depends.
As long as it isnt a Soviet gun, Thompson drum or M1919…

2 Likes

All thompson are nerfed sooner or later, instead soviet gun :roll_eyes:

I prefer MkBs and their opposite side (Fedorovs) variants to be removed from Moscow, or at least made into premium/restricted.

As for Mp40s - the only thing that sort of redeems them is the transfer to different campaigns capability.
It is used in literally every campaign, save for Pacific.

1 Like

russian bias