I don’t know if you browse the mess hall ever but i just wanted to make a positive thread after you made that reddit thread - that was very transparent and i think it’s a great step towards building more confidence between the devs and the players, and you also let us know that we have been heard, so thank you. I know i don’t speak for just myself when i say this kind of communication is very, very appreciated.
Can you link that thread? (Yes, I’m being lazy, but it’s Saturday morning, eeeeeeeeeh, cut me some slack, ok?)
2 Likes
7 Likes
Thanks from me too Keo. Good to know you guys really do care about the player base 
Sorry for shitting on you earlier lol
That’s a very interesting feedback collection.
The only part I have huge doubts about is the one about increasing snipers’ value by supposedly decreasing the effectiveness of all other weapons at range. 
PLEASE NO RNG DISPERSION CRAP!
(Meanwhile, sniper FG42 users: 
)
Still, it’s great to see that the ACTUALLY SHARED concerns across all players (without “bias here, nerf there” babbling) are being acknowledged.
4 Likes
It’s a nice list, don’t know why was only shared that on redit and not on foruns too… Reasons I guess
Also @Keofox nothing about letting us have more soldiers on 4 man premium squads… What a shame 
I guess that feedback isn’t reaching the devs…
3 Likes
Premium squads arent really a problem now. Most people dont have them. Thats why the devs probably dont care
I think theyre in a good spot, but i would like to equip 3 more soldiers with K98k on my Beretta 1918 squadon moscow
2 Likes
yeah thats also the only part I disliked reading about, but then again, he only proposed this as an Idea.
weapons lost already too much of their effective range compared to the real world.
But yea, still… snipers need some love.
I would be so glad if i could equipp it and could take it into Battle 
Out of frustration I bought 3 new squads today.
…#28…#29…#30 
It is, the document mentions something about an extra slot for premium units, we interpreted this as an extra soldier for premiu squads.
2 Likes
Cool Things but when will all that STuff arive us. Soon™?
i will wait, but many others dont.
This is the kind of transparency we should see in the forum.
It is kind of sad Keofox uses reddit for this instead, but at least it is something. It would be amazing if this kind of public collected feedback gets released more often and on official sources (aka news/forum).
Also, as @Shiivex said, Im kind of surprised there is little to no mention about premium squads. I guess that one is too sensitive to be made public, or not acknowledged at all?
3 Likes
No. Never.
It’s the only problem I have ingame. So I ill fight for it.
2 Likes
It’s the only one I have serious.
2 Likes
Couldn’t care less about your opinion
Never did.
And it’s insanity. Not madness
2 Likes
if you don’t see me writing about experience, gunplay, balance, bots, features, then it’s not my problem
3 Likes
We are all allowed to be passionate on things that mean something to us in game.
We all do it. I do it, I’m sure you do too.
@Shiivex has always done it in a constructive and logical way.
And ill support him in this quest as well.
2 Likes
Nothing also about hull tanks mgs, and tail gunners, if I saw correctly…
2 Likes
you should block me then.
coz i intend to keep asking for it.
In the doc file that @Keofox added, he talked about how players complained that snipers had problems because of the other weapons including smg, were getting the same range as said long range weapons. That they were thinking on adapting all automatic fire. that basically means a nerf. But in reality, all engagements in enlisted take place from 0 to 100 meters. Plus, we have two basic game modes. Either defending an objective or attacking. Players have been choosing automatic fire more because of this reason. you always need to cap. When you are attaking you are going to be in close quarters since you gotta go to the objective, therefore you are going to be around 10+ foes and you need weapons to deal with that menace. When you are defending you need to cap so you dont loose the objective. Obviously you are going to do worse with a sniper on your hands and the same applies for bolt actions or certain weapons that due to the design of the game, they get forgotten and overshadowed by later unlocks. Something similar happened with semi autos when they realised that they were making bolt actions look bad. Then there is the fact that the sniper squad is a 5 man squad, meaning that when all you soldiers die you still make your team loose 12 tickets, cause thats how the game works. Instead of working on nerfing everyones progress in this game why not give these squads more capabilities. Maybe the oportunity to have certain cqb guns like there is in bfv or maybe allow more capabilities to the squad itself, like they were saying also, more ammo more specific perks or roles added to the snipers in the beggining. Lastly, this is the squad i hate seeing the most when im dead at 0 tickets and i get to see other players. And you realise that the dude that picked it up has 3 soldiers. 1 sniper, 1 engineer, 1 trooper. Probably just like i did when i started playing that i also used snipers, and thought the other squads members werent needed because they were giving out my position and getting in front of me. Its sort of infuriating they made the game work in a way where certain squads dont fit in to the gameplay and then they just think of nerfing other things that are working as intended.
Im not doing well in the fact that you grind like a hog and then 6 months later after a costy grind they decided everything needs a nerf. I wanna see what everyone else think about this. Also i would stick where they say this but, it got deleted from the reddit and i cant access it anymore