sorry you might have misunderstood me, its by both map and game mode.
The problem is that you only have 2-6 dislikes! you must use that across all game modes and maps.
example:
Burma maps have separate invasion, destruction conquest ect…
The real issue is that there are a total of 21 different Pacific map/game mode and I can only dislike 2 and like 3.
BTW
there is no D-Day north, only D-Day which means that you cannot dislike German counter attack D-Day without also disliking normal D-Day where Allies storm the beaches.
Any evidence that it ever existed?
But not BR-map bans? How is this fair?
I will never stay on High BR Stalingrad matches anyway.
This one is probably the best feature since the Merge happened.
Why not allow us to actually BAN maps? People are okay with longer queue times as a compromise.
If you dont want to wait, just unban a few maps and go play right away. Why is this thought so scary to the devs?
I would 100% wait 3-4 additional minutes in queue instead of leaving Stalingrad and Rzhev every time I want to use Tiger II.
Whats meant by “Torso (basic)” ?
Didnt that customization get removed?
Anyone know which filter we’re talking about?
Would be cool to search weapons by name – I swear I had a GO Beretta carbine and can’t find it among my 200 German squads
Damn
Just little AI changes…oh well…
… seems like there is no hope for the game…
I have to admit, I did it.
It’s presumptuous of me to think I’m to blame for this, but I haven’t really seen any proposals for ABC36 lately. The decision was probably made a long time ago.
It is not that important feature. They shouldn’t have wasting time with it. Instead stay with the concept of limiting map pools to certain BRs. Much better system.
So far so good-
Wait i’m looking at the patch notes again and why the GMC is still BR V…?
We have forwarded it going to IV and keep in mind this is still the test server so things could still change.
Phew…ok thank god
what about ppsh41 box’s broken dispersion? Surely it has been forwarded numerous times.
I haven’t found any forum threads requesting an increase in the avs rate of fire, so it’s possible that someone is lying.
Very happy to see the 60kg bombs be replaced on this plane. I loved using this plane for the guns but it was never worth it overall because of the bombs, might actually give the J2M3 a lil love now.
Though I do worry if this is going to overshadow the addition of the N1K2-J being added. I could be wrong but either way I’m very much looking forward to trying out the rockets!
Look in the many fg42 threads.
It’s deliciously ironic. The FG family needed damage buffs to get normalization with other SF rifles. There was a lot of discussions about it.
Red mains came and said the only “buff” fg42 should receive is very high rof for fg42 and slower rof for fg42II, knowing full well it would in fact be a nerf.
But devs thankfully DID normalize damage values for FGs, yet boosted fg42 rof anyway.
Red mains came in those threads saying, and I quote:
“It’s impossible to compete against axis now, avs is too weak, fg42 shoots too fast and got 5 more bullets. Avs needs buffs.”
Then today devs listened and gave AVS the same treatment as fg42, as requested by those same mains.
It’s so ironic 
There you have it.
ok but where are the proposals to increase the rate of fire
Ohohoh, the very one red who proposed higher rof for FG42 and lower rof for fg42II!
Aren’t you glad? The higher rof for avs…
Is in big part, thanks to you 
