im totally down with br4 affrica. br5 is wild and crazy tho. Its too much and feels horrid. im not even into the historical crap, it just plays terrible because the maps arent meant for this, and no tweaking will fix that.
1 Like
By DT I meant Downtier
Find something elseto use as an excuse because historical accuracy went bye bye with merge.
Then you also want to remove Fedorov from all BR4-5 matches right? Jumbo and both Pershings from Normandy. AS-44 from all matches as it was just experimental gun. Also we will be removing Su-9 from the game. I can go on. There is nothing historically accurate about this game anymore.
1 Like
I donât speak English, but I want to express some of my opinions. I am really fed up with the various behaviors of Dark Flow, such as their updates never being announced, as if they want to update and donât want to update, everything is full of randomness, and some player suggestions are almost not implemented. If you apply all the maps in a chaotic way, why do we need to merge campaigns? Itâs completely a laborious and thankless task. In addition, I would like to say that Darkflow should put all the advanced teams of this game in the mall so that players can improve their gaming experience. I really canât understand their intention of taking down some advanced teams. They are the first game company to sell virtual goods as physical goods. Some advanced teams that are not cheap but have decent performance are sold at a so-called 70% discount or not at all, which is disgusting. We donât know what Darkflow is doing from beginning to end. For example, it updated content related to the United States and Japan in March last year, but this year it was delayed until the end of April, and we havenât had any previous team activities since January.
6 Likes
Literally a tank that no one will ever play on consistent bases.
Why? Because itâs just not fun tank to play against hordes of jumbos.
More people are playing combo of Tiger 1+Panther than Jumbos as everyone wants to rush to Pershing
Me? Yes
But up until today that has not been possible.
On the other hand, keeping Tunisia BR 1-3 is still possible.
And yes, I still care about every single leftover WW2 part in this game.
Despite the Devs massacring it actively.
1 Like
Doesnât matter what label you throw at this game. The point is that the original vision for this game that was presented, and released was more in-line with the preferences of people who lean towards historically flavored games, and older style online FPS shooters.
You can literally just go back into the early days of this forum (not even really that far back) and see how completely different the community and the devs were. Dev priorities have almost gone completely 180, can anyone really argue the opposite in good faith? Better yet go back to when it was being crowdfunded, see how the marketing was interpreted by supporters, almost universally it was considered to be a red orchestra spiritual successor.
Saying you want the game to become another modern FPS slop fest is silly, but fine, just donât go and start trying to gaslight me and other vets please.
13 Likes
You should consider making them playable up to BR4 and also separate BR5 from BR4. As right now BR5 on those maps is just a mess full of spamming bombs/rockets/he shells and overpowered infantry guns.
1 Like
Probably why they just now are âreleasingâ the ability to select which campaign we want with the upcoming update.
We have su9 in a WWII game. Where were you?
1 Like
Semo and A13 are alreaey there and you dont care.
1 Like
interesting - so since we are tossing historical accuracy completely out of the window - why not give G43 kurz its burst mode back?
7 Likes
Well this is all simple then, just make a checkbox when entering the queue âhistoric accurateâ and all you historic weaboos can play that single game a month against each other and the rest of us can enjoy a broad pool of maps. Hopefully at some point we also get a non accurate pairing like SU vs ALLIES
1 Like
I want its ammo capacity to be 120 instead of 90.
1 Like
If itâs Soviets then itâs fine. They wouldnât mind AK-47 as we already have RPK in the game and t-34-100.
5 Likes
What were they ignorant of exactly? The Panther F was removed, correct? I believe I literally just said I likely wonât stay, youâre just acting in bad faith.
1 Like
Again a good reason to stop br 5 . Thx.
@MajorMcDonalds Hi, whilst this is a step in the right direction, you will need to ignore all the naysayers that are around every change that is made in Enlisted, I too was against the big change to BR presets, now I like it. I get to use all my vehicles, planes again.
I think some people have said it before, make BR4 the limit and then itâs somewhat excuseable, but jets and KT2 and similar in all maps / campaigns is counter the merge strategy, against HA and unbalance with certain BR5 equipment.
I do think Moscow Stalingrad should be capped at BR3, Tunisia Extended to BR4 not 5, but allow Pacific, Berlin to be all BRs incl BR5.
Letâs see how testing goes, but I have been here since CBT, I love Big Action and that has all BRs, but the scale makes it fun, not played against Jets though⌠but I am a HA fan too, I am sure there are many games which donât care, but Enlisted on the whole has tried up until now.
Hope the stats and our feedback will not be a Turn off or on decision, but iterative in regards to possibly introducing BR caps to certain mapsâŚ
5 Likes