Testing expanded BR for maps

News
62

since merge the HA died so at this point Gaijin is just destroying the HA grave or whatever is left left from HA

3 Likes
63

HELL YES,FINALLY,I love it

3 Likes
64

Tunisia is great, low BR works best for the maps

65

i wonder if eventually we are going to screw this even more by making URRS figth germans on pacific or japanese vs americans on stalingrad

Gaijin when preffered map system along a reasonable penalty for deserters??

66

Iirc the monastery is apparently based on a real life version close to Moscow, but the rest is indeed meh. Even if it is a unique village, 99% wouldnt see the difference.

4 Likes
67

Just make us able to pick a campaign and it will be all OK.

5 Likes
68

It is not.

There’s a reason for why Tunisia was the least populated pre merge campaign. And even despite the fact that it was the only one that had those unique subfactions.

Tunisia maps are simply not good. Maybe with exception of one.

2 Likes
69

Well i do love moscow and tunisia the most…

But unless i can veto entire campaigns with the prefered system, i dont think ill like this.

Really messes with the odds of getting the theatre i want

1 Like
70

And what’s that reason? Be real, it wasn’t the most popular because the campaign wasn’t as iconic as all the others. It needs more maps and the armoured train game mode would have been perfect for Tunisia.

71

I guessed this would happen eventually, and I even made my peace with it, even tho’ I would have preferred making it more like:

-Moscow I-II (III in DT, as is it currently)
-Stalingrad I-II (III in DT, as is it currently)
-Tunisia I-III (IV in DT)
-Rzhev I-III (IV in DT)
-Normandy III-V
-Ardenes III-V
-Berlin III-V

Would be, at least to my eyes, a fair compromise

15 Likes
72

I personally don’t think this is a good idea. To be honest, Mr. Major, you and those lovely developers should really enter the game and see the current situation. It’s a complete mess. I really hope this situation won’t continue. I vote against to this.

6 Likes
73

Oh no, what’s next, all factions mixed in one team, on all maps?
Gameplay differs at slower paced BR 1-3 and more reactive BR 3-5, thus maps themselves should be created and balanced to accommodate different play style and different firearms, buildables, AT weapons and vehicles.
Please don’t make a clown out of this game.

3 Likes
74

Finally an actual decent idea. Would also make BR 4 more popular.

4 Likes
75

image
image1920×1080 293 KB

The Cave Village would be a good start.

5 Likes
76

Yeah. I get this. It will make tanking just so key to the game.

77

Hating a map because of a bug isn’t a valid reason

78

Always was against it. Welp, germans will be in love to play against usa high br CAS on tunisia.

17 Likes
79

The entire map is a bug, not helped by the AI being stupid.

2 Likes
80

Hey, thanks my dude, and yes I’d love to see BR IV more represented

3 Likes
81

The map is fine when it works. I’ve had really good games.