I just thought it would be convenient to explain exactly what led the game to this current situation requiring this test, was it really that off-topic? Maybe this comment with no argument can be preserved.
Exciting! More map varieties, the more merrier!
Thatās a question Iāve had for a long time. They spent four years complaining about historical realism/historical accuracy. Itās time to give up, guys. Just play another game.
Personally, I donāt mind the TRIAL PERIOD theyāve given us, after all, enlisted is still staying afloat thanks to the content and events, the modifications to the BR are simply complaints from about, what, 10 people?
Very well, it seems that if we donāt agree with this test, it will be considered asā off topic ā
Just make a own thread for this kind of feedback, genius.
Wait what? Lol
What about those players who donāt want to incorporate all brs?
What about this then?
Man, they donāt give a damn about us, 100%. The decision has already been made, right from the start. And all these words that they say, that these changes are only a test, are PURE, CONCETRATED LIES. Itās not the first time theyāve lied to us. And it wonāt be the last.
Wait what?
In my opinion, you have confused something, in this topic it is decided Specifically yes or no, there will be all the art on all the sconces or not. There was no talk at all about changes on the maps, and most people like the maps of Moscow anyway, so you donāt have to touch them. Let them stay for fishing There was no talk at all about changes on the maps, and most people like the maps of Moscow anyway, so you donāt have to touch them. Let them stay fishing where they play perfectly. And for a change, you need new Maps, and you need to make them more often than once every six months.
Nah bring back historical accuracy.
-Moscow I-III
-Stalingrad I-III
-Tunisia I-IV
-Rzhev I-IV
-Normandy III-V
-Ardenes III-V
-Berlin III-V
-Pacific I-V
So wait, wait, @LokalHero, you said this is ONLY a TEST and nothing has been decided yet, right? Then what are the improvements to the maps and inclusion of all BRs if nothing is decided yet. Or have you already decided everything, or do we not understand something? Answer, please. People demand answers and explanations.
We should at least bring back the old selection of maps for starters, and then think about how to make it more historical.
Most likely, this is his opinion, he wants maps for all br, thatās all.
Moscow and Tunisia maps arenāt build for high BRs period.
In general, ideally, I would like some 1944 Belarus instead of Stalingrad on 5br, but definitely not Moscow.
EXACTLY! Playing on Moscow maps on 5BR is fucking HELL. They are simply not designed for such quantity and quality of automatics and equipment (tanks and airplanes). It is often just almost impossible to run to the point.
Itās especially fun to play on the Beloe Lake map, which is hell.
.
The test period
Why isnāt this heresy on the test server then?
minor feedbackā¦I usually hate Berlin mapsā¦but they are alot more fun at BR 2/3
Most people do not play on test servers at all, even when thereās major updates, even less on minor updates, and there would be way less for just testing maps in all BRās, so testing it on the normal server is a nice way to get a significant amount of feedback rather than get an extremely small amount if it.
think that this problem with maps can be solved with actual map preference system. if you dont want your high BR lineup in moscow and tunisia, then select veto on those maps.
but idk how they will implement the map preference system, so it could be good solution or it could be done half-assedly and solve nothing.