Testing expanded BR for maps

I just thought it would be convenient to explain exactly what led the game to this current situation requiring this test, was it really that off-topic? Maybe this comment with no argument can be preserved.

1 Like

Exciting! More map varieties, the more merrier! :grin:

3 Likes

That’s a question I’ve had for a long time. They spent four years complaining about historical realism/historical accuracy. It’s time to give up, guys. Just play another game.

Personally, I don’t mind the TRIAL PERIOD they’ve given us, after all, enlisted is still staying afloat thanks to the content and events, the modifications to the BR are simply complaints from about, what, 10 people?

Very well, it seems that if we don’t agree with this test, it will be considered as’ off topic ’

14 Likes

Just make a own thread for this kind of feedback, genius.

Wait what? Lol

What about those players who don’t want to incorporate all brs?

What about this then?

14 Likes

Man, they don’t give a damn about us, 100%. The decision has already been made, right from the start. And all these words that they say, that these changes are only a test, are PURE, CONCETRATED LIES. It’s not the first time they’ve lied to us. And it won’t be the last.

14 Likes

Wait what?
In my opinion, you have confused something, in this topic it is decided Specifically yes or no, there will be all the art on all the sconces or not. There was no talk at all about changes on the maps, and most people like the maps of Moscow anyway, so you don’t have to touch them. Let them stay for fishing There was no talk at all about changes on the maps, and most people like the maps of Moscow anyway, so you don’t have to touch them. Let them stay fishing where they play perfectly. And for a change, you need new Maps, and you need to make them more often than once every six months.

8 Likes

Nah bring back historical accuracy.

-Moscow I-III
-Stalingrad I-III
-Tunisia I-IV
-Rzhev I-IV
-Normandy III-V
-Ardenes III-V
-Berlin III-V
-Pacific I-V

15 Likes

So wait, wait, @LokalHero, you said this is ONLY a TEST and nothing has been decided yet, right? Then what are the improvements to the maps and inclusion of all BRs if nothing is decided yet. Or have you already decided everything, or do we not understand something? Answer, please. People demand answers and explanations.

9 Likes

We should at least bring back the old selection of maps for starters, and then think about how to make it more historical.
image

4 Likes

Most likely, this is his opinion, he wants maps for all br, that’s all.

5 Likes

Moscow and Tunisia maps aren’t build for high BRs period.

7 Likes

In general, ideally, I would like some 1944 Belarus instead of Stalingrad on 5br, but definitely not Moscow.

7 Likes

EXACTLY! Playing on Moscow maps on 5BR is fucking HELL. They are simply not designed for such quantity and quality of automatics and equipment (tanks and airplanes). It is often just almost impossible to run to the point.

2 Likes

It’s especially fun to play on the Beloe Lake map, which is hell.

2 Likes

Why isn’t this heresy on the test server then?

14 Likes

minor feedback…I usually hate Berlin maps…but they are alot more fun at BR 2/3

Most people do not play on test servers at all, even when there’s major updates, even less on minor updates, and there would be way less for just testing maps in all BR’s, so testing it on the normal server is a nice way to get a significant amount of feedback rather than get an extremely small amount if it.

7 Likes

think that this problem with maps can be solved with actual map preference system. if you dont want your high BR lineup in moscow and tunisia, then select veto on those maps.

but idk how they will implement the map preference system, so it could be good solution or it could be done half-assedly and solve nothing.

2 Likes