god forbid a group of people has their own opinion about where they want the game to be in a forum
Well, my posts got deleted for arguing against the Facebook group at the beginning (alongside other people) for this reason so there goes thatâŚ
I am excited for this. I miss playing Tunisia.
Right. Weâ're done with the HA nonsense.
This thread is about improving the existing maps to incorporate all BRs.
If you have nothing to contribute to the test, keep it to yourself. Even better, create a new thread instead. We can all talk about HA and the lack thereof.
Keep it on-topic.
Further off-topic posts will be deleted.
9 Likes
What is on topic at this point then, since my post was fairly clearly on topic there tbh.
Read the original postâŚ
For me, feed back is dependent of the map preference systemâŚwhich isnt in the test so its not going to be valid
It all depends on the veto.
If i can veto a whole theatre or 2, expanded BR maps is fine.
But if i can only veto 1 or 2 specifc mapsâŚi really dislike itâŚbecause its harder to target the maps i want to play (for example I play alot of BR 2 because I want the best chance at Tunisia and Moscow)
So until I know the scope of the veto system isâŚ
6 Likes
I just thought it would be convenient to explain exactly what led the game to this current situation requiring this test, was it really that off-topic? Maybe this comment with no argument can be preserved.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
Exciting! More map varieties, the more merrier! 
3 Likes
Thatâs a question Iâve had for a long time. They spent four years complaining about historical realism/historical accuracy. Itâs time to give up, guys. Just play another game.
Personally, I donât mind the TRIAL PERIOD theyâve given us, after all, enlisted is still staying afloat thanks to the content and events, the modifications to the BR are simply complaints from about, what, 10 people?
Very well, it seems that if we donât agree with this test, it will be considered asâ off topic â
12 Likes
Just make a own thread for this kind of feedback, genius.
Wait what? Lol
What about those players who donât want to incorporate all brs?
What about this then?
10 Likes
Man, they donât give a damn about us, 100%. The decision has already been made, right from the start. And all these words that they say, that these changes are only a test, are PURE, CONCETRATED LIES. Itâs not the first time theyâve lied to us. And it wonât be the last.
12 Likes
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
This post was flagged by the community and is temporarily hidden.
1 Like
Wait what?
In my opinion, you have confused something, in this topic it is decided Specifically yes or no, there will be all the art on all the sconces or not. There was no talk at all about changes on the maps, and most people like the maps of Moscow anyway, so you donât have to touch them. Let them stay for fishing There was no talk at all about changes on the maps, and most people like the maps of Moscow anyway, so you donât have to touch them. Let them stay fishing where they play perfectly. And for a change, you need new Maps, and you need to make them more often than once every six months.
7 Likes
Nah bring back historical accuracy.
-Moscow I-III
-Stalingrad I-III
-Tunisia I-IV
-Rzhev I-IV
-Normandy III-V
-Ardenes III-V
-Berlin III-V
-Pacific I-V
11 Likes