A new common battle mechanic, Territory Attack and Defense, has been added, where every piece of land on the map is used as a condition for victory, allowing players to compete for more land in order to achieve victory
I do think this is an interesting idea for a new mode
Two semi related points, I’ve always thought a Giant Battle would be cool and would make so many things in this game realize their full potential
And I think we should have a map for all D-Day beaches
Big Action mode for every map
I really wish people would stop writing their suggestions like actual update patchnotes. Don’t say “this has been added.” That’ll only confuse people. Say “I want this to be added” or “I’d like this” or something to that effect. No need to say “this has been added” when it hasn’t and you’re simply asking for it
That being said, cool idea
that would be perfect, two game modes
arcade arena games like now
and more realistic game that big action would be
Enlisted’s true potential as a war game lies in Big Action mod. When I first played it I became a fan and it renewed my love with Enlisted again, it also opened new possibilities about how this game can be played. Now with the addition of APCs and many other features like airdrop supply crates, it’s only logical to take advantage of it with bigger playable maps. I’m waiting for a big action mod for Rhezv. I think that one is Enlisted’s best maps as of late. But we’re still stuck in the Left Bank side still…
So, a bit like warthunder’s enduring confrontation mode?
Sounds interesting, maybe there can be a bigger map (a lot of the map is unutilized anyway) and more players like a 20 vs 20 or 30 vs 30.
This, but 20 vs 20 instead of 10 vs 10.
Since it could probably be more harsh on hamster servers, perhaps it could be done in “persistent” battles.
Meaning those could be battles players could join, or leave mid match (they would last much longer afterall).
There could be a set amount of those battles in play… but to select them, we would need a lobby a bit like for custom matches.
How? If you have been on the forum for a long time, then this will not surprise you in any way. If you are new, then you can confuse almost any topic with the official news.
There’s 0 reason for you to word it that way
You mean what?
You word it as if it’s a done deal and whatever you’re talking about is actively in the game. “This feature has been added.” There is no reason to do that, and is either unintentional confusing, or maliciously misleading
As it were, it was written by an unofficial person.
And you are a fool if you believe everything that people write, especially those who do not have any official positions related to thing about which this “news”.
…
You know the obvious reason is simply because the OP isn’t speaking English as first language, eh?
Be more lenient will ya? Already nice he made the effort to write in English (or use a translator)
I’ve just seen a post using similar wording on Reddit a while back, it even showed up at the very top of my feed like a pinned post, and I literally had to do a double take before realizing it was just some random wording it weirdly instead of an actual announcement. Trying to prevent similar things from happened to others for convenience for us all
If I am lazy to use it, I don’t use it.
Anyway, this is exactly such moment.
By the way, on the Russian part of the forum, one wonderful person was banned for a year (or rather forever, the community just defended him and they returned him to us, although he has now become a monk, it seems). And without an objective reason.
Although in fact it was an obvious satire on making enlisted a better place. But probably someone could be confused.(The design was exactly like in the typical forum official news/blog/patch/whatever else it’s named)