Please also write why you liked it.
I choose the SOC-1 Seagull
Because it’s fun to fly for sightseeing and she can land on water.
1 Like
m18, got to see one in real life, i also got to see a t-34-85 actually moving probably on repaired engine
3 Likes
Well ATM, i am quite enjoying the German APC the one with smoke, and HE and another round, and it spawns people,
and the Universal carrier, love playing this as well,
thought i would hate the German one, and never bothered using it, till recently, even at BR V its fun, i like the smoke shells 
2 Likes
that question is way too hard to answer!!!
If the question is overall favourite I cant call it.
if its “whats been my favourite vehicle for last month or so?” its the IL-2-37
I just love popping multiple vehicles in 1 strafing run!!! or blowing the whole Tail section off the odd complacent fighter plane!
I think the Japanese Zero will be taking over as my favourite for the next month.
2 Likes
Stug III A because it’s cute. Sadly it’s premium.
10 Likes
though choices.
but contended between stummel and 251/1 and/or K750 cuz… p a n z e r g r e n a d i e r s.
tiger 1 because:
( but puma is equally good and fun to use)
as it goes for the allies, sherman easy 8 ( which it’s not yet in the game, but it’s in the editor )
and sherman firefly ( even though the shell is less than suboptimal
for the soviet, is2 and ba-11
and for the japanese, i came to like the chi-nu and ho ni I / III ( even though machineguns are a pain to use )
2 Likes
At the moment, my bush warrior JP IV.
I haven’t come across a vehicle this troll and fun since I played m18 really extensively. I really recommend it to everyone.
Otherwise, my overall favorite vehicle in Enlisted is the Pz III N because I love being an annoying scumbag.
(Sadly, I don’t have any screenshot saved and I am currently at work)
2 Likes
If I were on the opposite side, I would also like seagulls
Because you can shoot it down with an automatic submachine gun
1 Like
mine is stug 3f, it so fun for me when using it and cool design
3 Likes
Not really a vehicle guy, but i guess these would be the ones per faction:
M3 premium
Fw-190d
Firefly
Zero
1 Like
BA11 Soviets
Stug3 germany
Universal Carrier USA
Banzaiiii Charge
1 Like
In the game.
IRL
1 Like
My favourite is Panzer III M
Some people look at production data alone and conclude that the workhorse of the Wehrmacht was the Panzer IV.
These people base their views on the allied armour doctrine of quantity over quality completely ignoring Germany’s doctrine, economy and logistics situation.
The reality is that the Panzer III and StuG built on the same chassis carried Germany, but enough rant, I will let the statistics speak.
6 Likes
I wonder what vehicles has negative ratio. Some of them must, otherwise it doesn’t make any sense.
1 Like
Probably Italian Tankettes.
13-15 September 1940:
Their armour was almost non-existent, as the L/3 tankettes were useless, and the M/11 and
M/13 were not only inferior, but also deployed too late
Later vs Soviets in 1941:
However, the sixty light L3/33 tankettes of its tank battalion were plagued
by mechanical breakdowns16 and stood no chance against Soviet armour
Spoiler
As a latecomer in tank development during the First World War, the
Italians continued to produce licence-built French tanks in the immediate
aftermath of the conflict. The tanks corps, established in October 1927,
closely followed British developments and doctrine, which placed an
emphasis on light tanks in infantry-support roles.73 The first Italian-built
tank entered service in 1933: the three-ton Carro Veloce 33 (Fast Tank, CV
33, or L/3).74 Its manoeuvrability hinted at the Italians’ preparations for
war in their mountainous border regions, and it was intended for
reconnaissance and infantry-support duties. The two-man crew of the L3 s
were armed with two machine-guns (8 mm Fiat 35 or 8 mm Breda 38) or a
flamethrower,75 which hardly gave them enough firing power in tank
against tank encounters. The tank showed many deficiencies in the
Abyssinian War and during the Spanish Civil War and in 1941, the Italians
developed the L 6/40, which was based on the CV 33 casemate, and
equipped with the 20/65 anti-aircraft gun and one 8 mm Breda 38 machine
gun. In sum, its low weight and insufficient armour did not mark it a
notable improvement, and its bad cross-country capabilities made it less
suitable for reconnaissance duties than the AB 40 and AB 41
2 Likes
you cant have a negative number, just a very small like 0,0001. Unless you somehow inflict insane friendly fire on them.
Not all nations had data for this, not all tanks are destroyed by other tanks, besides some exaggeration is expected as claimed kill and real kill dont always align. Based on all data available to me at this moment I would say that the following tank have a k/d ratio worse than 1:1
M3 Lee and Grant, no surprise.
T-34, no shame here the Sherman didnt do much better on the western front.
T-26, BT-7, T-70 and other early war Soviet tanks, though I would like to point out that designs themselves arent bad, the poor production quality, bad tactics and Strong opponents were the problem.
Japanese tanks in general (Though they probably had a decent K/D before 1942)
Italians tanks in general got decimated, except Carro Armato P43 and M15/42.
Panzer I and other (mostly MG) tanks that are incapable of destroying tanks.
I suspect Panzer II and Panzer 38 as well. (panzer 38 did a great job pre-1941 but couldnt effectively fight T-34s)
Toldi 38 and 42M, they just didnt stand a chance against T-34s.
1 Like
Yes, you can.
A given tank type has been destroyed more times than it has destroyed enemy tanks.
Which would even make sense why stugs and pz 3 have such high k/d. Since at the beginning of the war they were farming that K/D on t-26s and bt-7s.
I doubt that Bt-7s and T-26s had positive K/D.
2 Likes
lets hypothetically claim that 100 Panzer IIIs and 100 BT-7s fought and all BT-7s were destroyed but only one panzer III was lost which would mean a 1:100 ratio.
We divide 1 with 100 which equals 0,01. 0,01 is still a positive number, unless I was thought a different maths.
1 Like
Mmmh my favourite must be the Tempest MkV
Because it’s currently the best allies fighter, and is commonwealth.
For FUN now, I like the motorcycles. And THE T60!!! I even bought a gold order t60.
1 Like
I mean, I would calculated it by recording the K/D of each individual tank. And then put that into an average.
If any type of tank was destroyed more times than it destroyed other tanks.
Let’s say one out of ten T-26s managed to destroy a German tank. It would have negative K/D
In this case 1:10
(And fore more examples 2:3, 1:2 K/D). Opposite would be positive K/D (2:1 3:1 3:2 K/D and so)
But I assume I just misinterpreted the facts you have shown. I am tired.
1 Like