The devs need to take some time and buff/nerf specific weapons rather than adding new shit. The difference in weaponry between Axis and the Soviets is baffling. Would go a long way to creating more competitive matches.
And how you propose to balance them? And what weapons are you talking about could you specific little more/better?
All ?
Adjusting sights, slightly increasing damage slightly, increasing rate of fire slightly, etc. One weapon I have in mind is the MP28, itās so bad. Also shotguns since youād essentially be lucky to get a kill with them
Yup, the balance across the board is just not there.
Stop talking about balancing. WW2 wasnāt fair. The Luftwaffe was better than any other airforce. The Soldier had Pervitin (Crystal Meth). You see? It would be more realistic if all that wouldnāt be balanced. But ok. I see that it is more fun to have the same conditions.
Balancing has pros and cons. But you canāt deny that the axis had the better equipment.
In my view you shouldnāt balance the weapons because it would be unrealistic.
Example: MG 43 with 1 drum magazin: 50 Shots; MG 43 with 2 drum Magazins: 75 Shots
It actually should have 100 shots.
Not by 1942, and most definitely not after 1943. Hell, even by 1941 it could be argued they were evenly matched with the RAF.
Lmao, historically german army was bad, for the entire war Western allaies and soviet union was better equipped and more tecnological advanced, if france have better general the war was ended in the 1940
i want the mg34 and mg42 to shoot straight, and not 30° in a random direction
so allies were just ultimately retarded or what are you trying to say ?
I mean it can be implemented to game very easily.
Yes look at the event
France and England refuse to mobilize and prefere give hitler land and resources, because they thinking he gonna stop
Soviet was weakened by stalin paranoia and the purge of half of the officer staff give the result we can see in the winter war and early barbarossa
In conclusion
The first initial succes of germany is only merit of other nation mistake, as i said if france have better gneral and instead of stay behind maginot, they alongside brits, gonna swarm germany the same day poland beign attacked the war ended in 1940
Then Iām affraid to think how much land they would conquer if they were good.
Personally Iām against āgermany noobā rethoric as it undermines the effort and sacrifice allies took to win.
their soldier was good very good, but Their command was noob, they sing victory to early blinded by the easy victory in france thanks to european poltician mistake, and then they make worse mistake wo make them lose the war
For example italy hold in ww1 aganaist Austria thank to our soldier wo sacriface themselves for stop them, our high command instead send them to die withaut a plan bad equipped and outgunned
Iām not saying they were the best, let alone āif only Hitler/Goering/Himler/Goebbels did XYZ germany would winā bull shit.
But saying that 3rd reich was a group of idiots is just as much retarded.
They was, the entire war started because hitler group need achieve the german āvital spaceā wo technically after absorbing Austria and Czekoslovacchia was already achieved withaut spill blood, so there is no motive to start a war in Europe at that time
War started due Treaty of Versailles being what it is.
Defeating communists was one of the war goals. Also most wars donāt make sense from common peopleās perspective.
And declare war on poland wo was in an allaiance with germany aganaist soviet union is smart? Germany, italy, poland,Romania,hungary ecc⦠was in the anti-communist pact a defensive allaince made for figth and stop the communism, but hey germany signed the molotov-ribbentrop pact with the commie⦠and i think you know the rest
Admit it germany leader in ww2 was a group of idiot
This not justify ww2 politican and leader lack of foresigth
well they did alot of mistakes such as take italy to partywagon but doh.
If we go down that road that the 3rd reich was entirely lead by retards how retarded was the allies ?