and were do oyu think erwin rommel’s nickname came from, the desert fox
HINT the poms
dont mind me im just upset at the russian bais and the ranking system
i am bored lol
T-34 should have just been a premium
1 Like
funny how 80% of built t34’s got destroyed thru entire war.
Im entirely fine with engi buildable 8.8 or howitzer.
2 Likes
notice how i said when they invaded, not talking about the entire war from 41-45
actually yeah we should give engie 2 the ability to build heavy AT; basically it can’t move but it sure packs a punch
well the tank losses for soviets were about 1:7 at early war.
Regardless they had t-34 made of stalinium.
At late stages of war soviets managed to get the ratio down to 1:3.
Im fine with it as long as it reliably deals with t34’s.
i love how the russians had 1500 t-34 and kvs in the opening of Barbarossa and germans only had around 1000 tanks with the 5cm or larger as the large caliber that could damage either and yet the t-34 got its shit kicked in so hard that people don’t like to deal with this fact of history
1 Like
the problem is, for some reason the last patches gave basically a lot of tanks more armor than they should have. While in War Thunder tank A gets destroyed by tank B in every shot, not so much in this game.
Like example:
-The event Jagdpanzer IV has about 50mm -60mm of angled armor, which makes this tank basically immortal to 85mm guns
However the gun mantlet of the Panther tank has 110mm of armor which gets easily destroyed…
However the gun mantlet of the Tiger tank has a bit less armor which then again is harder to penetrate for the 85mm gun
-The Premium Stug in Normandy is 99% immortal to Shermans and Jumbos with the 75mm gun, even tho under 100m distance it should penetrate the stug somewhat reliably.
-the Panzer IV F2 in Tunisia can struggle a bit to penetrate the Shermans 50 mm frontal chassis armor,
However the Panzer IV punches through the premium Matildas 75mm frontal armor no problem.
The Pumas l60 should just have enough penetration power to penetrate shermans in close range, however it doesnt.
The list goes on.
There are some big inconsistencies with armor values in this game and I wish they would stick closer to real life performances with tanks.
3 Likes
not to mention that the second unlock T34 85 90mm thick turret bounces a lot of panther shots, which means that said tank by that logic must have at least 180mm of effective armor which is ridiculous.
Panzer IV F2 countered the first t34, Panzer III struggled however the L60 gun was mediocre but good enough at close range, which is why they kept the gun in use with pumas.
The T34 was not a god tank, however it was fast and dirt cheap to produce.
the 88 was not needed to destroy the T34 tanks, however the german army did not have any KwK 40 7.5cm guns on tanks yet, which they then added after finding out that the anti tank gun version , the pak40 was good at taking out KV and T34 tanks, which led to the Stugs and Panzer IV long barreled tanks.
The T34 was not a god tank.
1 Like
You really need 88mm flak cannon to destroy it? I guess no, try flanking it or bomb it with the stuka
stop with these arguments, flanking is only an option if the enemy issnt paying attention.
A skilled player will never present the sides of his tank.
What are you talking about?
Have you ever TRIED to kill it?
Even with 4E/4F1’s APCBC, I can still deal with it.
The difficulty is just another T-50
What? You are trying to knock it out with your PZ2C/3E?
1 Like
If T-34 is justfied in Moscow, so is Tiger(P) in Normandy
5 Likes
No, you seem to be onlyone ever achieve it. Its totally balanced now as you have proven to destroy it once.
/s
Except T-50 had downside of having rather poor HE against infantry but being extremely good against other tanks.
T-34 doesnt have such downsides its extremely good against both.
1 Like
The sloped armour implementation is hacked out of WT and so all the T-34 variants (an ironically the T-50 as well) are super trollish in both games. WT has evolved its formulae for normalisation, overpenetration and armour spalling to the point where things are working more or less as historically as they can within the constraints of WT.
I don’t believe Enlisted has brought across that detail yet, but its likely to come just as the decals and other artefacts.
The vulnerable spot on all T-34 variants from the T-34/76L11 all the way through to the T-34/85 is the rather large and easily identifiable turret ring (esp at Enlisted ranges). The other vulnerable spot are the turret cheeks and the commanders cupola on the late war variants.
This has been implemented consistently and as long as your aim is true and RNG doesn’t work you over, you’ll get a kill or at least score serious damage/kill some crew.
The 2cm and 3.7cm tanks in Moscow currently struggle frontally against the Soviet T-50, M3 Lend Lease and the Valentine Premium tanks, but they can immobilise them, where the infantry will finish them off for you with det packs.
For those hiding in grey zones you will need bombs/rockets.
1 Like
WTF? So then rest of the forum is total garbage?
I am the one who called “<10% WR” player
Who the fuck is winning?
what you dont seem to understand is that things can be imbalanced regardless is there a tiny weakspot where you can get your kill.
No one really gives a whistling fk about your esport fantasies.
1 Like
cmon the t50 was still manageable 2 weak spot and OHK, now the t34 has 1 weak spot even smaller than the t50 and can nuke you where ever its shoot, this is just OP (btw also the german counter suck).
3 Likes