Firstly, as one of the earliest toys to purchase advanced squads, I had already purchased two engineering squads and several submachine gun squads from the Normandy campaign, as well as the Owen and FNAB43 squads from Tunisia, before the release of the Berlin and Tunis campaigns. The weapons of these squads overlap with the technology tree but cannot be replaced. Why is it not allowed for players to replace weapons that overlap with the technology tree, and even why is the main weapon slot of advanced squads non replaceable? We have spent money to purchase these squads but cannot freely use them, and some advanced squads do not even have their own unique appearance. All advanced engineering squads lack one person. I call on everyone to stand up and reflect on these things, We should get what we deserve for giving money, instead of being like some guys who always stand in a darkflow position to excuse them
The criticized firing rate issue of the STG45 and Horn assault rifles has also been ignored. A slight increase in firing rate can turn them from toys into usable weapons. Some players talk about accuracy, but firing rate is the main indicator of assault weapons. Even if this weapon has the accuracy of a sniper rifle, the firing rate is too slow and will not have too high intensity. Moreover, the STG45 team is something we paid for
And the magazine and balance issues of the Beretta M38 team that I recently mentioned, only got a new pair of pants in the end, and the ANZAC caps and other issues mentioned by other friends were ignored and refuted by some players in a sophistry way. What should we do to change all of this
If our reasonable demands are always ignored or even ridiculed, why don’t we learn from War Thunder players to fight for our own interests? The only good thing Darkflow has done recently is to lower the development difficulty and slightly increase revenue. I don’t deny the changes he has made, but that’s not a reason why he has repeatedly ignored player voices