I average 90+ kills a match and regularly break triple digits as an infantry main. I know how the game works. It ain’t that hard to run a whole lobby with BR III
Only Americans and Soviets can compete with BR3 gear against BR5 while Germany and Japan suffer with crappy BR3 weapons (unless you have event weapons for Germany or premium BAR).
Then don’t play BR III Germany or Japan. Play I, or II, or IV, or V
Thats not a solution.
@Dregomz I strongly question your argument that USA at BR III can compete with the others.
Frankly BR III should only fight BR III. Thats it. Saves us arguing over who suffers the most.
Yes it is. You have a whole 4 BR’s to choose from that isn’t BR III. Why are you all so darn adamant about ruining the last vestige of the Enlisted I fell in love with? Let me have BR III darn you
I see. I didn’t know you could get up tiered that much. Haven’t really played BR II a whole lot in my honest opinion. But I thought the odds were a bit better than BR III. I wonder whether this is the case with BR III as well. Since for some of the factions the matchmaker mentions BR IV-V while queueing as BR V.
Might be ? I dont know.
Just personally noticed while upgrading my rifle squads at BR2 that it gets way too often uptiered against BR3.
soviet with BR5 is IV-V
JP with BR5 equipment is III-V
Murrica is III-V as well
GE is IV-V
Idk why.
Thanks for the information. Yeah. I think it has something to do with the number of players playing these factions. Helps the matchmaker to narrow the BR range a little bit. But it is just a soft rule as far as I am aware.
Oh yeah BR3 “standalone” would be a lot of fun
- Claims opposition is in minority
- Couldnt get more than two likes for one post while opposition got 4x more.
What players need is distribution based on ability
Instead of having 1 to 3 players be the nannies for a bunch of idiots
Or increase the penalty for low-level equipment
For example
When a player holds more level 1 to 2 equipment than level 3 equipment and ranks lower than the top 5, the income will be halved.
This can well reduce the chance of anti-intellectual groups without learning ability or equipment poisoning high-level environments.
Since you can continue to destroy the game environment, fairness and paid experience for the excuses and smear of anti-intellectual groups and extreme discriminators
So it shouldn’t be difficult to add some mechanisms that really help the environment, right?
I don’t play level 3 Japan
Unless there is a better rocket launcher
But I like level 3 Germany
No. 4 can destroy IS2
Tekken 60 can destroy all ground vehicles
41R is the best level 3 submachine gun
VG15 is the most stable semi-automatic rifle
I hear ya and totally agree, but the DEV’s? They either don’t hear the players, or don’t care because people have been trying to get them to stop that for as long as I can remember. “Not enough players” they say. Well, the games end in one team being inhabited by bots anyway after the mass desertion, so that’s not an viable excuse in my estimation.
Tokyo and Super C do have overwhelming dominance
But this is the only advantage they gain in exchange for low vehicle and anti-vehicle performance.
You can try to use A2 machine guns, impact grenades and smoke to make up for these shortcomings to a certain extent.
Dregomz has me beat, I main germany so trying to run a match with inferior smg’s is a pain.
Imagine if we could dislike their comments lol he’d have negative likes guaranteed.
Then either don’t play BR III, or use weapons that aren’t SMG’s
Not that hard. I’ve done a little bit of Germany III gaming myself and my go to set up is Assaulter, MG, AT. I’ve done just fine
Only because you lot are hell bent on ruining BR III
“use weapons that arent smg’s but I use assaulters” … okay use smgs. Mg’s? good luck with that attacking same with using AT which would be the gewehr which would get you clapped by br 5’s you really aren’t making a great argument against br 5. Any person at br 5 if competent can easily clap anyone at other br’s.
The problem is finding someone competent in ANY BR