Stop mixing the weapons of the different factions

I understand the soviet Panzerfaust was not designed or built by Soviets therefore should be replaced by a Soviet weapon but why remove the German Panzerschreck when is was produced by Germans and actually extensively used in combat, I understand the design was based on the American bazooka but it was actually 88mm caliber when the bazooka was 60mm.

1 Like

I just realized I originally meant to say Allied Panzerschreck. Whoops :sweat_smile: You get the idea

1 Like

Now I understand you, thanks. I completely agree with you.

1 Like

I don’t understand I was talking about hurricane and P38 what are you talking about ?

Can you remember me what was the us tactic to arbore while they were versus a tiger I or II tank ?
It the same with the hellcat everyone hate it because no one use it as a flanker I know greyzone limit a lots but you can always do someting
Today was in Chi-nu vs an M26 and god damm can’t pierce it in front what should i do ? :thinking: got him in the flank nothing hard

Yes it does since Soviets can have amazing semi auto with fast reloading time, Americans can have amazing semi autos with fast reloading time and that on top of amazing smgs and great tanks. There are no point in playing as BR2-3 Axis since everything in a TT that they have outside of tanks are total underpowered crap.

1 Like

Also just add the ability to pick up AT weapons off enemies

1 Like

Why continuing this wreck if it all comes back to you desperately trying to find something that is on the same level as Panzerfaust vs. PTRD (and wont find anyways)

Now real life?
Real life didnt had magical greyzones and US didnt face that many Tiger, especially IIs, to begin with.

Nice that you already did my job to explain why this doesnt work.
Or why lights in general suck in this game.

Yeah sure pal

russian have some AT weapon too less produced because of the panzerfaust capture , they have dog too even if the working is desirable. lots of ppl spam ptrs on track then demo or tnt. i’m not saying it is a viable answer !

if i can flank Jumbo in my Pz IV why you can’t in a more mobile sherman vs tiger II as if the guys were looking always at you, if it turn the turret shoot it, go on the side of the map idk man. I don’t why usa don’t have laser gun since they want pen everything in the front.
I don’t know if i can talk about the russian T34 vs Pz 3 wich is a pain in the ass and frontally is suicide
not even HO-I versus M4 105 ?

Light don’t have the same role as IRL that’s why they aren’t that high br is just for the beginning

Shall we talk about japan too with their 100 mm pen lancher without sight ? the emperor guiding the shot or something ?

Panzerfaust shouldn’t be as OP as it is you chould carry only one ! one german squad carry more faust than some tank carry ammo :joy: :rofl:

And how realistic is a proto RPG again?

That didnt work, would be a pain in the ass to develop and probably end as killfeed for Axis.

You mean the one out of 10 kills that probably were not even in greyzone to begin with?
Why only using a Panzer IV if Puma is better for “flanking”?

Why should he not? Most of the time CPs and other hot areas are in vicinity to each other so you dont need to move your turret for 90° degree.

Because they assume that most Germans dont play like dumbasses I guess.

I dont know if this is sarcasm or another case of shooting yourself in the leg.
I mean just wait until they move their turret I guess.

So thanks for again proofing how meaningless “flanking” is in the game because otherwise fast(er) tanks would have high(er) BR.

Get the super rifle grenade with 220mm pen. Its dope and cool.

looking for realistic weapon when Usa has T20 and russian AS-44 is a joke right ?

the dog was a joke due to most of the time the poor dog came under russian tank

maybe because I was BR III and puma is BR II ?

you don’t need him to move to 90 to kill him

just stating a fact that what USA is facing other country have it tooand at a lesser BR wich is more frustrating because less player know what to do but it seems less important for some. And i don’t even know how those tanks we’re killed since flanking is “useless” if we’re following your logic.

a magic 220 mm rifle wich is actually where ?

I dont know. The creator of this thread called captured weapon unrealistic so definition is really weird anyways.

Is there a law saying you cant take BR2 stuff to higher matches?

Except yes. It has to be about thaz degree, especially at longer distances.

It is. Even you struggle to find a clear answer here.

And I also remember that flanking or 90° T-34s with the Panzer III was so easy most people just didnt play Moscow Axis because it made too much fun and was too easy it was boring.
Or the Jumbo back in Normandy times with no Panther or Panuerfaust. People couldnt stop expressing hoe much fun it was playing against the Jumbo.

I see Japan is high priority for you because it was even in a thread you liked…

And you already forgot it.

1 Like

japan is not my priority at all i’m not main japan. just like every other player who play all of the nation japan is the one who lacks the most of things.

Being a suggestion and being added is clearly different

can’t you do the same versus KT so ? didn’t know flanking t34 and jumbo was so easy and too much fun that is was boring lol ? he must be funny for lots of ppl struggling to kill KT so nah ? because as you said what was happening vs jumbo is the same vs KT but maybe since it’s not the allied camp they can’t have that ?

that’s part was humoristic …

1 Like

I guess you didnt detect the sarcasm.

Yeah… not really…

Well it is the only option for Japan from the looks of it.

It would be a nice add and they could finally get some descent AT. But does DF follow this logic ? it’s something other

1 Like

as i’m not that good in english i’m trying already my best to understand and writing something wich as sense firstly ^^ sorry for that

we don’t have a lots of lights too usa have m24 , urss t-50 while puma for germany i’m not talking about the starter one

Yeah. Hoping for the best. Fingers crossed. :crossed_fingers:

1 Like

Hope too, it would be like the Granatbuchse ? hope the sights isn’t as horrific as their first launcher :rofl:

1 Like

Oh. My bad then…
Darth Vadder - My apologies

Well, it depends on what you count as a starter tank, I guess (which, in my opinion, would be the T-60 and the Panzer II C). And you missed the Crusader, which would be decent on a mere technical manner, given its speed and cannon.
And honestly, do you need more lights if the Puma and the M18 should be enough? If more is automatically better, Axis would have the best TT only based on the inflation of stuff there.

1 Like