The Soviets got the German panzerfaust a long time ago, in the next update the Americans will get a premium copy of the German MG42 called the T24 and the RPzB. 43 Ofenrohr German anti tank rocket in the tech tree, my point is if we mix the weapons from different tech trees it makes the game less realistic and why play a tech tree if all are the same? If you prefer the German weapon just play Germany and if it’s a matter of balancing America has their own good weapons they don’t need German copies. If the argument is they are captured weapons in game you can pick the enemy weapons from the floor.
If these trend continues when are the axis receiving the Allied weapons on their tech tree?
42 Likes
My dude they more than captured, they licensed, cloned and copied japan is full of it a copy of the pedersen and garand
2 Likes
T24 is perfectly fine, it’s far from copy paste. Just look at its rate of fire, it will play completely differently.
But I agree that pure copypaste is extremely meh.
They should at least make a different model/texture for such weapons. Just like they did the MP-717(r) and PPSH-41 or MP40 and captured MP40.
They are literally the same weapon, but they look different and have a unique names.
9 Likes
Exactly and the Japanese copy of the Garand called the type 4 rifle had only 125 units produced and probably was never used in combat. Let’s face it not all factions can have 10 different tier 5 weapons, if you want to grind fast through the tech tree that is even a good thing.
2 Likes
It’s not copy paste.
8 rounds vs 10 rounds it’s quite difference for “copy paste”. The weapons have completely different model as well.
Yeah, small amount of content is definitely a good thing for live service game -. -
I am literally waiting for new stuff several months, I already grinded out all tech trees.
2 Likes
You are just exaggerating. Did Soviet become Germany 2.0 after receiving the panzerfaust?
You all act like some weapons for balance will immediately make all the faction the same.
2 Likes
Of course it was changed to the Japanese arisaka caliber, building a rifle when you don’t have the correct bullets for it would not be too smart.
rather unusual of you to say that considering your strong anti copy-paste stance.
Because it’s not copy paste. 
It’s literally the same case MP717/PPSH. And I always said that’s the prime example of how they should deal with similar weapons.
Different name, different model, and in this case even different stats.
2 Likes
It is for me, but okay.
It has different stats, different sights and a different model, far from a copy.
Giving a captured AT weapon is very different from giving f.e an identical semi auto, soviets have panzerfausts and a M1 bazooka and yet all tech trees aren’t the same
3 Likes
1 Like
Your dog looks very intelligent.
1 Like
That sounds very sad.
4 Likes
we are grind slaves.
2 Likes
Yep, I am basically playing only during events (with some exception).
Luckily, Enlisted isn’t the only game in the world.
Yes, but I always liked grind as long as the game is fun. Progress can be so much satisfying.
used in combat was never the bar, one physical prototype before Japan’s surrender which only the ho ri and American rocket tank break
sorry but prototypes, limited production, lend lease and captured weapons were always part of the game also what the pups name, would look so cut in a hat any hat, lol
1 Like
Yes, unlocking new weapons is a big motivator to play. Specially if they are not found in other tech trees.
Well, T24 is not even grindable.
What I don’t like is pure copy paste ofenrohr. But it is what it is. Everything else is unique. And I do enjoy prototype/rare weaponry.
It’s basically The Forgotten Weapon YT channel but in game.
The Type 4 its a reverse engineered weapon so sorta a copy it is effectively a Garand though but chambered in a shitty Japanese round. https://youtu.be/ng15MmxGLgI?si=zVArTfiwS_p4bMa3