Which do you prefer in Stalingrad the pziV G or the pziV F2, please state reason why - to me I thought the G coz of armour, as both have same gun, although one has slighter bigger muzzle break, not sure that makes any difference.
I also have the Stug III, which has a slight different camo too, I know it has no mg, but I do actually like the look of it…
3N all the way
›Hardier armor vs the IVs
›Rapid fire infantry support gun so you can keep pace with T-70s
›HEAT that skull fucks everything
If it was long range engagements on better terrain I might go for the F2, but in the city I always go for the 3N
stug makes no sence to use coz no mg
and if you can use the stug, you can have both III N and F2. so no point in discussing what is the best one.
i find 3N more worth coz of the amazing heat round.
F2 its just like any other pz4 in other campaigns, nothing special. i like it, but still whats the point,…
I don’t fight tanks I kill camping troops or troops trying to recap point… HE is totally underrated, tanked who mg snipe I get it are pointless not aggresive tankers like me…
stug would be top notch, even on normandy, if had MG.
serious amazing tank. but no MG its kinda a deal breaker when 9/10 times you are fighting inf and not an enemy tank.
Ah but even you know that sometimes we do things that don’t make sense for enjoyment.
Thats why I use the StuG. And it was my Grandfathers tank.
I do like Hetzer. I sat in one in the US that was operational. The only thing weird about it, is the breech block being opposite to load. You had to be a yoga master to put a shell in. Plus its cramped as hell.