Since you don’t know how the shot was fired or what the parameters are, you can’t reproduce it.
Anyone can make stupid insinuations and claims when they have no idea. Better just shut up!
Since you don’t know how the shot was fired or what the parameters are, you can’t reproduce it.
Anyone can make stupid insinuations and claims when they have no idea. Better just shut up!
Nevertheless, it was necessary to post a recording with target shooting, and not a screenshot)
Mental gimnastics at work, you’re clowning yourself here pal, the parameters are there and the results reproducible, the beauty of science.
Typical wehraboo seething when they are unmasked
The datamine weapon stats are kinda more usefull than someone shooting at something as this is kinda essy to manipulate.
No, unfortunately sometimes they don’t show anything.
What?
Armor penetration of tank shells is impossible to know, and the recoil in datamining must be tested in practice. That is why no one understands why the pak 40 penetrates more than the Panzer 4 cannon or why the fg 42 2 is easier to control than the auto, despite the better characteristics of the auto in datamain
Oh fair point