Soviets need tier 4 map

When the merge happens tier 4 soviets will either be in Berlin or in Stalingrad. No one wants to see t34 85 roll around univermag so could we get Budapest maps for tier 4?

8 Likes

Why Budapest of all places? I think soviets do have quite number of urban maps.

it came first in my mind.

2 Likes

That’s understandable xD

I would like to see operation bagration. Swamp map of Belarusian forests could be interesting and toxic in good way. :Pp

5 Likes

I think, Finland-44 or the assault on Königsberg and Pillau will be cool for 4 tier

3 Likes

Why not bagration or romania ?

1 Like

Kursk

2 Likes

Anything but another swamp map.

6 Likes

xDD are you not enjoying the famous conquest map in Normandy campaign?

2 Likes

I love it too much, that is why I rather have only that map in a special place of my heart.

1 Like

Poznan it’s better

It’s a tier 4 moscow, only change some houses and voskohod propaganda

2 Likes

Do you care for historical reasons or balance reasons, because it seems the community is split on these issues

1 Like

historical. I dont care if they take some freedoms like m4a2 76w in US army but the t 34 85 would be too much

Ah, thanks for reminding me how lazy of a decision this one :joy:

Could’ve just put the M4A3 76… the tank that was actually famous and used by the US

SOON™
Probably, but anyway, its not like a BR5 sherman would see much use if players had access to Pershing or Comet.

That’s true, sadly. Hopefully it would still be at least somewhat useful.

I suggested adding Pershing preemptively in Normandy, since Moscow has Pz4F2 and M2 Carbine already broke immersion.
But M4A2 76 was added instead which is better than nothing but still inadequate.
Western allies probably won’t be very fun to play on BR5 until Pershing or equivalent is added and players unlock it, which could take weeks after the merge and I was almost naively optimistic with this time.

1 Like

They missed great opportunity.

Imho I don’t think tanks are biggest issue. Lack of any AR or equivalent to FGs is more significant.
M2C is basically just compensation for overall shitty assaulter weapons.
They lack decent AT rocket launcher as well. M9 is kinda joke in comparison to panzerfaust or early panzershreck.

2 Likes

that can easily be fixed with adding better shells for AT weapons.
As for infantry weapons, Axis dont have an equivalent to M2C either. Its a question of preference, which one you like more, the biggest issue with M2C is the bad sight.
otherwise, its fairly balanced.