Some new planes for Germany and a lot of new planes for Italy

like the title says,some new planes for Germany and a lot for Italy at various BRs.Italy in particular needs a lot,as they are quite underequipped in terms of original vehicles,and with this suggestion you would be able to be 100% Italian in terms of vehicles in every BR so Italy enjoyers don’t have to use underperforming planes anytime they want to play a different BR,as well as a few random new german things as well.

He 112 A-0,BR1 fighter
You may be wondering why I suggest this,as the BF 109 E7/U2 would be at the same BR with more 20mm ammo,have low caliber MGs AND bombs,but this plane has a 20mm that is rather special (MG C/30L (20 mm) - War Thunder Wiki),as it would have increase penetration compared to other 20mm cannons (37mm for this,26 for MG 151,19 for MG FF/M),so for this reason it could be worth having.

https://wiki.warthunder.com/He_112_A-0

Ba.65 (K.14) L,BR2 bomber
A bomber that is pretty similar to the SBD-3 Dauntless,while having a roughly 200kg difference in explosive mass in the bombs,having 4x 100kg bombs available.

https://wiki.warthunder.com/Ba.65_(K.14)_L

DO 17 Z-2,BR 2 bomber
A counterpart to the SB-2M in having a fairly good suspended armament while having not much pilot controlled anti air power,most of it resting in the gunners,which you get quite a few of.it would have 2x 250kg bombs (I feel 10x 50kg bombs would be too powerful for BR2) which would be overall less explosives then the 6x 100kg bombs,but to “make up” for it,the pilot does get to have control of a MG15 in the cockpit,although it does have a low ammo count.

https://wiki.warthunder.com/Do_17_Z-2

G.50 AS serie 7,BR2 fighter
There already is a BR2 Italian fighter,the C.202EC,but that lacks any bombs while having an improved MG armament.This plane would trade the 20mm cannon for 2x 50kg bombs,and would be a rough equivalent of the P51C

https://wiki.warthunder.com/G.50_AS_serie_7

RE.2001 CB,BR3 fighter
It would have 2 12.7mms and 2 7.7mm machine guns,and a 250kg bomb and 2x 50kg bombs (for reference,the P51D had roughly 500kgs with both of its 500lb bombs being roughly equivalent to a 250kg bomb,while this would have 350kgs)

https://wiki.warthunder.com/Re.2001_CB

F.C.20 Bis,BR3 bomber
It would be a slightly different BF110 G2 as the best description.It would have a 37mm cannon with 53mms of penetration and 2 12.7mm machine guns in the front and 2x 100kg bombs,so it would sacrifice raw anti infantry capabilities to be able to use bombs and have a working high caliber cannon (please DF will you just fix the german 37mm already it’s been like a year).Another notable difference is the 12.7mm tail gunner instead of 7.92mm

https://wiki.warthunder.com/F.C.20_Bis

S.M.79 bis/T,M,BR 4 bomber
A triple engine bomber that will preform similarly to the JU188 in game,with some minor differences.The most notable of these is having less gunners and them being 12.7mm instead of 20 and 13mm as well as one less 250kg bomb then the JU188,but in return having a player controlled 12.7mm

https://wiki.warthunder.com/S.M.79_bis/T.M

Re.2005 serie 0,BR5 fighter
Pretty similar to the earlier Fiat G.55 in BR4,the difference would be having a almost centrally mounted 250kg bomb instead of 2 wing mounted 100kg bombs,and trading 2 of the 12.7mms for more 20mms.

https://wiki.warthunder.com/Re.2005_serie_0

Do 335 B-2,BR 5 bomber
Equipped with a 500kg bomb and high penetration 30mm cannons,this plane will be a worthy match for the P47 at BR 5,having the 500kg bomb only otherwise found on the JU87 R-2 and 30mms not yet seen in enlisted will make the plane truly unique,and not the piece of crap the FW190 D12 is.

wiki.warthunder.com/Do_335_B-2

Z.1007 bis serie 5,BR5 bomber
while this plane would heavily lack in defensive armaments at it’s br,with very few gunners of only 7.7mm and 12.7mm and none of them pointing frontwards (the roof gunner can swing the gun around to the front,but that takes time),combined with the poor turn speed and overall performance you aren’t very protected from anything and will often have to rely on friendly AA or fighters,or hope that you don’t have to engage enemy planes.To justify the high BR and terrible defence,the plane will be given a 800kg bomb (the biggest in the game if added) and 3 100kg bombs.

https://wiki.warthunder.com/Z.1007_bis_serie_5

16 Likes

fry from futurama looks surprised and shocked

Dont forget my baby!

image

4 Likes

Its always good to see what options we still have. However I think the BRs and candidates you chose for some of these are very ill concieved.

BR2 would be innapropirate for this plane, yes its bomb load is decent however its flight performace and armament are too weak to face off against BR IV counterparts(which is possible after the soft rule was implemented). Therefore the Ba.65 should be BR I

This fighter is better compared to the A5M4 or He112(which you have correctly assesed as a BR I airplane). Mediocre armament, bombs and flight performance make this aircraft a BR I aircraft at best.

This attacker is way to up-tiered as BR III It should be at best BR II, it sounds impressive with all its powerful armament but the thing can barely carry it to the battlefield. Simply dogwater flight performace. But Enlisted has Air spaws so that may help a teeny-tiny bit. Its very powerful, however BR II would be better.

This is NOTHING like the Ju188, that is a high speed bomber, the S.M.79 is a standard Medium bomber. Shear number bombs wouldnt make up for it. I Suggest the S.M.91 as an alternative to this.

As you said, its slow and clumsy in the air. In Enlisted you sadly cannot rely on your allies to cover you as a bomber. Don’t be distracted by the big number on bombload weight this would be a bad addition. I suggest the S.M.92 to replace this

1 Like