Would end up in 10 minutes queus. What a perfect solution lol.
This concept is just disillusional. It would never work.
Nope, absolutely. Except for the situation in which they would have added a check mark “wait for a filled room”.
Yeah, lol. Have you tried to play tunisia axis or Berlin axis atm?
It’s not rare to wait 2-3 mins for a match.
With all your suggested changes, the wait time would be just horrific.
You mean when? At morning?
how will you get balanced game for them? can you guarantee that they will get opponent of their skill level at all times? it would make top skill level simply coop or single player most of the time.
out of whole playerbase around 50% are console players and they by default are worse than 80-90% of the pc players with exception of few players. should we turn the crossplay off at risk of once again having lots of bot lobbies after merge?
i think it is enough to have same starting position. i wouldnt even be against having current no matchmaking if everyone actually had option to bring whatever weapon loadout they wanted into the match without being limited by grind. but considering grind BR MM is next best thing.
Quite sure I said it dont have to be locked to certain skill group.
But rather priorities people of same / similar skill group.
Unlike what we currently have the absolute cluster fk show.
While I hope the upcoming BR & merge will resolve some of these issues, it definitely wouldnt hurt the game to have somekind of “skill” based matchmake included as well.
Pretty sure even this has been frequently asked aka having option to turn off crossplay.
Since as said even bots are often more useful than people with that funny icon nexto theyr name.
Then how weak players will get good?By playing against weak players?
This is just delusional here is What I think (My 2 cents) what is having a balanced match means?
It is (at least for me) that whenever 2 players see each other having the almost same chance to kill each other , right so equipment wont let this balanced matches happen since you might want to run MP40s but enemy team wants to play PPHS41s and in case you see each other at the same time you will lose (nogoer 50/50 but 20/80) right that’s why devs are implanting BR to make equipment factor in this scenario kind of obsolete (still they will be weapons that are better in their BRs) but the scenario I told will never happen cuase you need to factor skill now in scenario one The mp40 guys is not your average Hans but rather seasoned eastern front Veteran Hans he sees the PPHS41 guy early because he was paying attention see he has PPHS41 rules out CQC (knows he gonna lose ) goes behind him (positions himself ) and shoots now when our eastern front veteran Hans wins its not because of pure luck he was paying attention while PPHS41 guy was running like headless chicken. He was rewarded because he put time into game (He feels good and proud of himself) acquired skills by playing against good players losing matches and now sees the result. When we implant SBMM we rule out skill from the scenario 1 and with BR weapons imbalance too and now who kills who is up to who sees who first (luck based ) when we add SBMM we punish good player for being good we don’t encourage players getting good rather we encourage them to play bad so they could enjoy the game
By guides on youtube, if they wanna.
By using they brain, if it exist.
By using training their hands, if they also exist.
lol yeah bro sure how you heard that experience is more important than knowledge if you play against weak players you will never be able to get good you want to protect weaker player from veteran players but you forget that veteran players once were newbies,too. They gained experience by playing against good players remember guides only get you so far.
1 Like
yea i practically become a different person after grinding stalingrad axis for 2 month straight
2 Likes
I think we only need to match up player’s number on each side at this stage
It will be like War Thunder where everyone is playing like F1 car driver while munching on Panzerschokolade
K/D is the worst way to qualify people in this game bruh
Is this just an example, so hard to understand? I definitely don’t have the right numbers for the right analysis and the right conclusion. I think it’s pretty damn obvious.
This is certainly right. But such games already often happen, but there are too many players in the game who are difficult to distinguish from bots.
Without full access?
Lol, I got my experience/skill playing against bots, not players. Of course, your statement is partially true, but playing against much better players is harmful. Playing against slightly better players is already useful. A measure is needed here.
In addition, there are players who play for the sake of the game, the result is not important to them. They will be at the bot level anyway.
You didn’t go into much detail here but I’m not sure I agree. I was fairly good at mainstream FPS games in my younger years and jumping into more recent releases after 15 years away, they don’t seem harder than my first rounds in Enlisted. Small sample size for sure.
Maybe it’s more due to overall player population. At my age, there are plenty of much stronger enlisted players but I feel I can do just as well in other FPS as in enlisted (which means pretty well unless in a lobby of stacks where I may hold my own but be middle of scoreboard).
FWIW, I’m not ancient but surely my 3 sons are older than some on this forum.
yes without full access so i miss a lot of good stuff that isnt mp717
This is masochism, my friend, in its purest form.
1 Like
nah man i would say detemination and i become the hero of stalingrad axis for a while
1 Like