Some ideas i had over the time i played

Hi everyone, here are some ideas i thought would be great in enlisted

  1. Make the Flak 88 on every map usable. The model is already there and it would be great. There would be two ammo types. 1 Anti tank and one that is against planes.

  2. I would like a new map in the Berlin campaign. The schlacht um Bautzen. The last german tank offensive. I thought about 4 tank spots on every side (because of the mentioned tank offensive).

  3. More trucks like the opel blitz or some sdkfz.

  4. Improved movement and tank crossing for tanks. They could try it in a ww1 event
    The germans get the a7v and the british the mark 5 male. There are also many ww1 weapons in the game already like the gewehr 98 for the germans and the smle mk 3 for the british. They could also add machinepistols like the Mp 18 which is in the game already and a machine gun like the lewis gun for the british.

  5. Every nation had an aa so i think every nation in the game could get one too like the M45 for the americans or the 72 K for the russians.

  6. The new tank individualisation is nice but you need to pay money for it. I thought aboit unlockables. By playing the tank long enough or killing enough enemys you could get individualisations like a Balkenkreuz, A Amerikan white star or a russian red star.

  7. New campaign. Invasion of poland.
    Some early war and new machine gun tanks could be put in that campaign. All polish guns that are used on the germans could be used by the polish. Tanks are now listed
    Germans:
    Panzer 1
    Panzer 2
    Panzer 3 b
    Panzer 4 c
    Polish:
    Tk 3
    Vickers E
    Ft 17
    7TP

  8. Another new campaign. Fall of france.
    Used could be all the french guns that are now used by germans like the mas36. Also tanks that are on the follwing list
    Germans:
    panzer 35T
    Panzer 2
    Panzer 3 b
    Panzer 4 c
    French:
    Ft 17
    Fcm 36
    R35
    Char b1
    S35

  9. New tank features
    The radio operator can call Artillery strikes over the commander and the machine guns could be used.
    Soldiers can sit on a tank like in a car.

Thats it, hope you like it

3 Likes

i just thought of another idea. how about you can buy the standard guns for bronze tickets. that would be good for players who like that gun or for players that want to emerse more

Somw of these suggestions are good, others i don’t agree with.

Maybe insteado f just being usable, it could also be buildable.

I personally don’t play Berlin much, but from my experience, I’d say 2 tanks are enough. 4 tanks on both sides would just be way too much.
And as for the campaigns you suggested, I’m not a huge fan of them right now. The devs need to work on bug fixes, maps and improvements on existing campaigns and not split the playerbase unnecessarily. And even if new campaigns were to be added soon, the it needs to be from the pacific. There’s way too many germans in the game, any more campaigns with them will just have more copy paste equipment and barely anything unique.

And arty strikes should only be callable by infantry, tanks are already way too strong, they don’t need universal buffs.

4 Likes

well, 1.i agree that the flak 88 should be bulidable
2. I thought there should be 4 tanks because it was a tank offensive and i want pacific campaigns too but i just wanted to add them because of poland and france.
3.tanks are not as op as you think. they can be so easily desrroyed by an anti tank gunner,a pioneer or every soldier with a explosive ot tnt pack. i just wanted that the radio operator should be given a funktion to do something and not just be a replacement crewmember

I get that, but I see balance issues with that.

?
I don’t get what you’re trying to say by that.

Not really. It all depends on what tank and positioning.
A Tiger 2/Panther/T50 in the greyzone is not going down easily. Tanks are the strongest type of vehicle and possibly the strongest class in the game in terms of pure kill power. They don’t need a universal buff.
With even just my panzer 4 in moscow, I can easily get 50-100kills a spawn if I play my cards right. I don’t think being able to call arty is necessary at all.

Maybe, but not this. Arty should be reserved for infantry.

i want french and polish troops in the game. that is what i meant with that. polish and french tanks and planes.

Yeah, but you gotta think about both sides. Which would mean germans again, with the same stuff, again.
And if you’re interested in vehicles, then the French stuff is in warthunder, and as for Poland, their stuff isn’t in warthunder, which means it likely won’t be added, as it would take the devs more work then just porting over models.

yes…that was most of the war. italy didnt do much. japan didnt do much. all other axis countrys where too small. what you could do is winter war.

yes but i want it in enlisted. it all started in france and poland.thats why i want those campaigns.

You sure about that?

And maybe instead of crying out for more copypaste campaigns and making sure noone plays the germans anymore, cause they’re the same in every campaign, we could improve what we have right now while Enlisted still has a playerbase.

Still feel like it’ll do the game more harm than good. Especially cause those 2 campaign’s axis side would literally just be ctrl+c,ctrl+v’d to each other from Moscow. So there’d be no incentive to paly them and the campaign would turn into single player for the allies.

2 Likes

I doubt that the 88 would perform well against planes flying on a low attitude. Those Anti Air cannons (both German and Soviet ones) work better against tanks and could work in Moscow and Stalingrad.
2.
Four tanks per team doesnt work in Berlin/ Enlisted, especially in a urban campaign with Fäuste.
3.
Mechanized infantry doesnt work in Enlisted.
4.
Uhh More events and dont know how a WW1 event and better tank movement go hand in hand.
5.
Probably introduced later.
6.
Red Star wasnt used much on Soviet tanks. Otherwise yes.
7.
Sounds hard to balance and Germans for the sixth time?
8.
Western Moscow 2.0 and Germans for the seventh time?
9.
No. Dont make tank gameplay even more ez.

Lol.
Yeah. Whatever happened in Asia wasnt much. 15 to 22 million casualities in the Second Sino-Japanese war? Meh.
And Italy is just too small. Which is why they dont have a tech tree in WT. Oh wait…

Engineer 2s should always build a better AT gun.
For Stalingrad it would be Pak 40 (75mm) and ZiS-3 (76mm)
Tunisia Pak 40 and M5 (76mm)
Normandy Pak40 and M5
Berlin Flak88 and Russian D-44 (85mm)

did i say italy is too small? no i did not. i meant hungary and pther small axis countys in europe

the second sino japanese war ended 1945 when the usa dropped the bomb on japan

it would not be that big of a problem because Bautzen is a town. it would be 2 maps
one mostly open terrain with trenches and cover everywhere like the chateau du bosq map and a map in the town where it woukld be open like the le bre map or the ruins of vaux map.

why does it not work?

it would one hit every plane and have the aim help like an aa. it could work.

you dont have to play it

ww1 saw the first tanks roll in to battle and was filled with ditches and trenches, also to nerf tanks mud or breakdowns could be implemented.

Then be more specific.

The war in Europe ended 1945 as well. So I guess Germany didnt do much as well I guess.

And thats good because? Moscow also has like two or three villages/ town so 4 tankers as well?
Fun aside four tanks plus 2 planes would mean that at best case scenario, only four plebs would be able to attack/ defend the caps. No. Doesnt work. This is a infantry main game.

Lol Those are probably the worst tank maps apart from D-Day and you wanna put four more tanks there?

Short answer: Maps are too small, game is too fast, nobody use bikes and this community is full of retards who dont have any tactical knowlegde.

But it doesnt work like that. The 88 and any other heavy AAA were designed to be effective against bombers. Bombers. Do I really need to explain why they wont really work against my P-51?
“BuT iF I hIt, PlAnE mAkEs BoOm BoOm”. Yeah, IF you hit the fighter and your chances are so low, that you could go into a casino and would probably have more luck winning there.

The time, they sometimes invest in events, could be used to fix the AI. But well. Some people just wanna have new toys instead of fixed old toys I guess.

And? WW1 tanks had different design and different “tasks” to fullfill than WW2 tanks and there are some notable differences between WW1 and WW2. It doesnt male sense to test a new system there and by now they never tested sth. in events.

that was not my point, my point was

that the casualties where that high because of 2 nukes. but there where more deaths than just 81.000. and 9.000.000 civilian casualties. and of course the number is that high if they fought 8 years

I like the suggestion. Give developers a little bit of time and it’ll be good