Some advice

To be honest, I don’t know why the production team likes to use less common weapons as their starting point (the G33 in Germany, the M1907 in the Soviet Union, and the 38 in Japan are carbines) , why not use the weapons that every country has? (German 98K, Soviet Mosin Nagan 91/30 and Japanese Type 38 rifles) , this setting is stupid, and the current technology tree is really bad, it does not match the history! This is not as good as the current campaign mode, VG1-5, MP3008 and VG2 even in front of the G41! 'the G43 is actually behind the ZH29. This is so out of line with history, and the technology tree has so little equipment, nothing new. Is it that hard to add something new? ’ ? Your work efficiency is ridiculous, if the new version is even more so, I would rather not play

1 Like

Yeah, I don’t like this idea neither.

But since they can simply say we misinterpreted information we got, it’s kinda non relevant to discuss anything before it’s live.

That’s because for some weird reason they choose to make WWI weapon extremely OP (Federov). But they choose to make last ditch crapgun MP3008 as shity as it was irl. They’re not even consistent, so trying to use any logic here is kinda meaningless.

Rather than artificially balance every weapon to suits its year of deployment.

1 Like

Calm down man. I’m sure the dev team has almost given up the historical settings because they are lack of the ability to make it good.
It is simply an entertainment game, and players also show relative low fps skills, too.
My suggestion is not to set high standard for the devs. It has been hard for them to finish the EASY merge and now the new BP even becomes a difficult thing. And when they lose more players and get less salary because of the laziness, things may become better (or worse).

1 Like

So because casuals aren’t good at fps games, devs can do illogical and pretty much random decisions. Very based logic.

1 Like

This.
If you are looking for one constant in the whole game development process, it’s this.

1 Like

also, don’t use the mods category for rants.

you should use the mess room.

mods category is for editor reasons. not rants or anything else beside modifications.

Japan used the Type 38 carbines extensively throughout the war, and the Soviets threw everything at the wall during Barbarossa, including the 1907 Mosins. The only one even remotely arguable is the Gewehr 33, and even still that one supplemented the Kar98k in a similar manner to the Type 38 carbine to the rifle at times. If you had complained about the M1903 Springfield, then maybe your argument would have made more sense.

The Type 38 carbine was used by the Japanese cavalry and artillery. The most widely used Type 38 rifle in the Japanese army was the Type 38 rifle. The Soviet Union may have used the M1907, but the M91/30 was the most used

Yes they were not the primary weapons, but they were still widespread enough that to ignore them from the tech tree is equally bad to your problem, if not worse. Also, a lot of this has to do with balance, as if we took your idea to heart Americans the gun they should have as the starting rifle is the Garand, outside of the early war Marines. The M1 Carbine should also be after the Garand because it was issued in a similar manner to the Type 38 Carbine. This would make no sense in terms of progression, and would also be horribly imbalanced so in the interest in making a progression that makes sense and balance, sometimes certain things have to be tweaked.

1 Like

And the Thompson should come before the M3 but balancing.

1 Like

Yeah, the Americans kind of just don’t work with that system.

1 Like