So, when will PPS 43 finally move to BR3? kinda tired of not being able to play BR2 right now

Mess Room
21

Not everybody run body armour so stop complaining please

3 Likes
22

With such lovely logic like that that means everyone should have body armor because not everyone’s gonna run them oh wait I forgot the Soviets and the allies will get their teeth kicked in because when the Germans or the Japanese actually start fighting back you’ll diminish what’s left of their player base so stop giving that nonsense excuse because it does matter from the competitive aspect.

1 Like
23

No, those players that matter do carry armor, and losing to those sucks, because I know that many of those matches would have ended differently if our places were switched.

Like I did yesterday three times in a row. 3 losses,
top leader board enemies all had PPS43 and body armor, or Paratroopers with PPS43 which is the same thing. I encounter this on a daily basis and it makes me not want to play BR2.

1 Like
24

I think I’m the only one who prefers the Lanchester to all the other BR2 weapons.

1 Like
25

Lanchester is top tier without a doubt, its got the same rate of fire as PPS 42, good sights and decent accuracy, if you compare that to the other BR2 options, Grease gun and Owen you get a more solid all round weapon.

Technically Owen shoots as fast as PPS 43 - but it has a terrible sight picture

26

Need mp38 + pps42 on BR2 and mp40+pps43 on BR3 :dromedary_camel: :dromedary_camel: :dromedary_camel:

2 Likes
27

Why?

28

not

1 Like
29

Like two types of type 100.

30

500 rpm guns don’t have a place in BR3 is what I am trying to say with that

31

How i interprete br2 weaponary between soviet and german is that german good mg no good smg, whilst soviet good smg no good mg.

Mg13/zb26 > madsen
Mp40 < pps42/43

Maybe we can adjust some recoil of pps, but i don’t think moving it to br3 is really necessary.

1 Like
32

Another situation where BR -+0 would make it not such a big deal.

33

you’re comparing a full auto smg to a semi auto rifle. your comparison doesn’t make any sense

34

stick mag ppsh has broken dispersion

just for the record:

Weapon Name Obtained BR 10m 100m Velocity Magazine Reload Alt Reload Rate of Fire Vertical Horizontal Recoil Control Vertical Horizontal Dispersion While Aiming Hipfiring Visual Recoil Recoil Dir ADS Speed Recoil Offset Sprint Factor Weight Additional Info
PPSh-41 Parkerised Premium V 6.6 3.3 450 71 3.4 3.06 1150 20 9 0.4 8 4 0.70 0.0 15.0 1.6 0.45 0.72 0.3 100% 5.3 71/71
PPSh-41 (Box) 58000 XP III 6.6 3.3 450 35 2.4 1.9 1150 21 9 0.4 8 4 0.21 0.0 15.0 1.6 0.4 0.82 0.3 100% 4.1 35/105
PPSh-41 122000 XP V 6.6 3.3 450 71 3.4 3.06 1150 20 9 0.4 8 4 0.70 0.0 15.0 1.6 0.45 0.72 0.3 100% 5.3 71/71
Rifles with Dual Clip Reloads Damage Single Bullet + Clip Reload Timings (s) Recoil Moving Spread Increase
Gewehr 41 74000 XP III 14.4 11.8 750 10 4.8 350 1.00 1.30 0.80 1.20 85 30 0.20 0.0 15.0 1.3 0.35 0.77 - 100% 4.9 10/40

normal SMGs have around 0.70 dispersion, semi-auto rifles around 0.20 dispersion, but stick mag ppsh has only 0.21 dispersion which is obvious broken, but Darkflow still hasnt corrected it even though its a known bug since months.

5 Likes
35

PPS-43, P-38G, PZ III N
The nightmare of BR1 noobie

2 Likes
36

Nothing wrong with it where it is. Another whine post.

2 Likes
37

You cant be serious - A SMG IS NOT SUPPOSED TO BE AS ACCURATE AS A RIFLE.

My god.

2 Likes
38

True - however MGs are support tools, SMGs are the main Meta in low BR.

Or in other words: PPS43 > MGs

1 Like
39

Tell me where 500+ rpm vs 800+ rpm is fair?

1 Like
40

Weird when I use the PPSH 41 stick I get more dispersion than other russian SMG

1 Like