This thing destroys most if any br1 tank. when it comes to br2 and br3 it can track those tanks like its nothing and makes it easier to throw tnt packs or make the tank crew leave their metal box. Going prone with it in the grass isn’t a problem at all when it can destroy most of the br 2 side armor and all allies tank in any up tier or down tier also makes it harder for their tank to shoot back if they can hardly see you in the grass. if youre deciding not to buy this BP because of the prone requirements I highly suggest getting it since it will out perform most AT rifles and hold up in up tiered battles
1 Like
all semi auto AT rifles can do that.
Solothurn TEST Vs Semi-Auto AT Rifles = BR 1 - Suggestions - Enlisted
10 Likes
Ive had a few of the AT rifles fail me even from the side of a tank standing next to them this thing shreds it like its cheese while other anti tank rifles have a painfully slow reload and hardly penetrate the sides of tanks
all semi auto AT rifles reload between 3.2 and 3.4 seconds
3 Likes
it has 10 shots in a clip enough to take out 2 tanks in seconds
in any case. if you read the thread, its not that its been “slept” on. Its just that its not remarkable in comparison to BR 1 Semi Auto AT rifles. you pay a heavy price with no mobility, for not much “relative gain”
6 Likes
I checked out the post and it says to forget about killing Shermans and other allies tanks when it can penetrate the side of the tank easily. when it comes to Russian armor thats a different story but you shouldn’t be trying to attack a kv1 with AT rifles. It’s an extremely good AT rifle and comparing it to japans AT rifle performance is pointless since they dont fight each other ( weight is the only thing to look at ). when it comes to the Russians AT rifle its worse by a lot because it will struggle vs any BR2 or BR3 ( it can only see up to BR2 ). with the PTRS you will still need to get the side of most tanks it sees while half the tanks the S-18 sees it can destroy with hardly any problems.
1 Like
the conclusion of that post makes the S-18 seem like its a weapon that no one should try using since its in br2 when it can hold up vs most br2 tanks and fight br3 tanks with ease
??? The conclusion says nothing like that at all. It says it is fun in the first sentence…, But it should be BR 1 with the rest
And it certainly can NOT hold up against BR 3 tanks if you read the results…Even the PTRS 41 has more viable targets at BR 3 than the Solothurn. And we all know how that perfromed it BR 2…(it got moved to BR 1 and rightfully so)
1 Like
like I said before I had other AT rifles fail me when shooting at sides of tanks standing near them. this gun doesn’t have any problems what so ever
well
we already have GRB39 which can destroy BR5 Tanks
and its a Tech Tree AT
8 Likes
the ptrs is weak compared to the S-18. S-18 can hold up vs allies tanks in br3. when it comes to Russian armor it will struggle but it will do better then single shot AT rifles like the GrB or the pistol
the conclusion says its not justified to be at br2 and its pointless at BR3 when its the other way around
Are you using a translator? Because the meaning isn’t getting through. Im just curious.
2 Likes
I think you mean mag, bud.
1 Like
lol. the S-18 is great tool to be at BR2, it can fight BR3 allies tank with hardly any problems ( clearly you can’t shoot through the front of tanks at br3), the Russian equivalent is half as strong as it, and moving it to BR1 will cause it to get nerfed making it as usless as other br1 AT rifles.---------- Even with the Prone limitations the Solothurn is fun . HOWEVER This is a “Limited Edition” BP Weapon for a Nation that Doesn’t have a semi Auto AT rifle. Its results do not justify it, especially considering the Bipod/prone condition. Relatively other AT rifles are just as effective/pointless at BR 3 (uptier happens alot). It should be at BR 1 with the others (especially the Type 97).-------- from reading this it seems like the S-18 is being slept on
im just going to assume its a translator issue, or you didnt read
3 Likes
clip and mag is the same to me even if they mean two different things
I mean, not to split hairs, but you use a clip to reload a magazine. Ah, whatever. As long as you know the difference.
3 Likes