Trying to kill two very different tanks by throwing detpack at same spot is not a very big brain move.
Tiger II has it’s ammuntion stored in the back of the turret, any light penetration there will blow up the tank, just check x-ray before coming to cry on the forum.
Other sources say 35mm.
It doesnt make sense to write with you, you know everything better.
So many people complain about the bugged and glitchy KV-1 armor, there even are videos on YT - but Mr. Smart just proved on the TRAINING GROUND (wow, real combat situations!) that we all can’t play and have hallucinations.
The KV1 hull has 40mm of armor on the bottom. Explosives penetrate 35-38mm. Of course, you couldn’t destroy it.
NO.
Just to show you how trustworthy armor values are and how great the explosives work on KV-1 … and T-34 also, with only 20mm armor on those spots!
1st try:
Aiming:
Nice throw!
Poof. Nothing:
2nd soldier, 2nd try:
Should work. It is just 20mm steel:
Poof. Nothing 2.0. Even no fire or damaged engine etc.!
Still working perfect. Stalin approved:
3rd soldier. 3rd try:
Yep, again a “L2P issue” throw:
FINALY! Everything “works as intended”:
THE END
Like I said
You need better teammates to share the pressure
Or join the ranks of level 3 weapons
The most important reason why I like to play Level 3 is the anti-tank weapons
Or you can also hope that Snail can install a quantum engine so that they don’t have to wait for a year like repairing bugs such as large-caliber armor-piercing bombs in aircraft.
I joined BR3 after a long time some days ago. Still 50/50 crap teams, but hell I missed the Panzerfaust… and the event MP41(r)!
41R is the best German tier 3 submachine gun
When you use it and 383 with the guerrillas, they can effectively deal with all enemies within the medium distance.
You know
The authorities believe that protecting the rights of idiots to poison normal people is far more important than implementing skill classification.
for a person who claims to be able to play, you prove the opposite with enviable persistence.
i did a little research and found out that the explosive package does indeed penetrate 35mm of armor. i don’t know how the calculations are done, but it is obvious that it cannot penetrate 35mm of armor.
but i also found out that the explosive (c4) penetrates 45mm of armor. and yes, if you put this under a KV-1 tank, it will be destroyed.
maybe you should study the game before complaining?
Are you high?
Your logic:
You: “Throw it on top of the tank, you can’t play. L2P”
I did it (and I also did it way before).
You again: “You can’t play”
You just admitted that the behavior of the explosives and/or of the armor are a fault of the game. And you still blame me?
I could pick up TNT for sure and I am aware about the better anti tank capabilities - but I can’t focus completely on anti tank (and glitchy armors) tactics, I need my AP mines too for other stuff. Explosives should be enough to get through 35mm of armor…oh wait!
Lets stop the conversation. It makes no sence to show you the glitchy/bugged armor (even 20mm armor from the T-34 can withstand multiple explosives shown with enough evidence).
because it is fault of you.
You continue to justify your ignorance. I have already shown you how you can destroy the KV-1. If you do not want to do it the right way, that is your problem.
Please, take your medicine. You understand nothing.
i did a little research and found out that the explosive package does indeed penetrate 35mm of armor. i don’t know how the calculations are done, but it is obvious that it cannot penetrate 35mm of armor.
but i also found out that the explosive (c4) penetrates 45mm of armor. and yes, if you put this under a KV-1 tank, it will be destroyed.
This information is in the table. Here, look.
I said 35-38 because I wasn’t sure, but I checked the information and told you. Why didn’t you read it?
and you don’t know how explosives work and how armor penetration works in this game. keep me posted.
This is a common problem, it can happen with any tank. But in the end, if explosives have to penetrate armor, you will. And if the explosives are not supposed to penetrate, you will not. These are the facts.
With those eternal wheraboos vs commieboos bickering matchs…
No wonder the forums became so dead and boring…
It has nothing to do with this vs that but it rather started with the big gap between BR2 and BR3 (and bad teams, not enough rallies, and so on).
…and some buggy mechanics that some one completely denies.
Now it’s a common problem? Some hours back it was my fault and skill based.
I don’t know.
In my opinion, apart from some weird mechanics available for just one faction (the dreaded NOT cosmetic body armour, the paratroopers that can equip everything), and perhaps the ppsh41(box) exaggerated laser dispersion,
I would dare saying the game is rather well balanced at this point in time. The only br things I would change is lower br for many tank destroyer vehicles, but for no specific faction, instead including all four.
All the rest seems decent to me. Axis Germany, Soviets and Allies factions are at last pretty much complete, content wise. Only Japan faction needs more things, especially in the plane department (they don’t have nearly enough) and perhaps their tanks should be revised but I don’t use them enough to comment.
…
Now saying axis br2 cannot stand br3 Soviets is exaggerated Of course it will struggle, it’s one br less!!! But axis 3, will do just fine vs Soviets 3.
It’s as silly as the other fool asking for t34 to be br2, and Zis KV to be br3.
There’s only one solution: to broaden your horizons, and play Soviets AS WELL! Play ALL factions! Then you will see balance ain’t so bad afterall.
But mostly play Japan. Real men serve the Emperor with honour and katanas.
And that was my point until it escalated here. The gap is just to huge compared with BR3/4 and 4/5.
When facing equal BR’s it is totally fine. Russia maybe has better semis (and smg’s), but axis has better machine guns. US and JAP also has their benefits.
Indeed.
I did and I enjoyed it! Got a solid BR2/3 lineup with all event Thompsons available.
Japan still needs BR3+ launchers and low-br planes that dont start from carriers though.
not true. if you play meta, then it is all about SMG and tanks on BR2 and BR3. there is really no huge gap there(well maybe if we look at japanese tanks and soviet SMG which are outlier). you are having problems with KV1 cause meta for BR2 is anti infantry tank, aka pz 3 N, while other non meta tanks have easier time dealing with KV1(marder, puma or J1). are SA BR3 rifles better than BA/SA BR2 rifles? yes. are BR3 SA rifles better than BR2 SMG? in short range no(most crucial range in game).
BR5 compared to BR4 on other hand is big upgrade. AR are big upgrade compared to smg, SF are big upgrade over SA, some tanks cant be penetrated with BR4 tanks(at least without searching for pixel perfect shot).
