ffs, I wanna play my favourite campaign again, yet the T34 is still indestructible. Why is tank balance always so incredibly broken?
PZIII L60 has no chance at fighting back a T34, yet in the real war it did, heck even the short 7.5cm gun could take out a T34 because of its turret shot trap. Michael Wittman did exactly that, took out 6 T34s in one fight with his short barreled Stug.
And now realism aside - one tank can kill , the other one can’t. This is so obviously broken and needs to change no matter what.
Can someone explain to me why the T-34 is needed when there is a T-28E? It only has advantages, there are two more DT.
And there is no sense from armor, because a normal player is always the first to shoot at tanks. So seriously, what is the T-34 for?
t28 gets one shot killed by Panzer IV, T34 is immune to all german tanks.
only advantage is better HE against infantry ( which is very important ) yet trading more firepower for having god mode is pretty obviously a given which tank is better.
we are are not talking about flanking or air support, balance means that both side get the same chances. If one team has to flank, but the other doesn’t have to - then we have indeed no balance.
also T34 can not really be flanked, basically all sides have the same armor, you can damage the tank by shooting the side and rear of the turret, but even that is very unreliable.
The T34 simply need a massive armor nerf, especially the turret.
yea… imagine one side of the team gets infantry, which could only be shot in the back, but the front is completely protected from bullets. There still would be some poor souls arguing that you only need to flank.
seriously are people really not noticing their flawed logic?
Because the T-28s are slower, have worse armor (“easy” to kill with AT rifles), and have worse AT capabilites. Let alone the fact that all tanks before the IV E cant pen the T-34.
wrong.
only the PZIII with the L60 can penetrate the T34, yet with little to no effect. It will not kill a t34 in any reasonable amounts of shots, actually it will most of the time run out of ammo before killing the crew.
well okay, Moscow HEAT is only for premium tanks, yet from my tank range testing it seems to be less effective than Stalingrad HEAT, not too sure about this since the tank range with no existing crews as targets seem to have unreliably results…
Other than that, the Panzer III will not deal any damage when penetrating the T34, its what I call “fake” penetrations.
one T34 will win in a direct fight vs 10 other tanks without a doubt. Its completely busted.
It’s ok but I wouldn’t use “wonderfull” by any means.
Big wheels often catch the bullets and upper side is angled so it’s tricky to pen sometimes. Turret side is a good target though but it also depends on the angle.
But in Enlisted, the main thing is to farm infantry. Tanks are the second thing, and also the T28E can destroy any German tank with a shot.
The fact that the t-34 have a unpenetrable armor not make it more effective, it’s just that bad players can do at least something with it.
And this armor still cant save from 250\500kg bombs and tnt.
Although the t-34, when it was first added, annoyed me a lot.
and completely stopping the enemy team from using tanks, while still being a tank that can kill infantry good enough is no issue? I could understand your point if the T34 had no MG and no HE and be a pure AT gun, but even that would be broken, because being indestructible and completely denying the enemy team a mayor part of the game is just bad game design and completely ruins the game, there is zero skill involved in having a immortal AT gun.
getting killed by low level players shouldnt really matter in my opinion, I mean if a Panzer II could take you out, then at least so could you. The ability to take out experienced players is much better than being protected from new players. The problem here is tho, that the T34 gets both extremes.
