Semi-automatic rifles damage is much lower than a gun rifle, semi-automatic rifles in middle distance never a shooting people, need two to three shots to kill people, because the semi-automatic rifle walking is too big, semi-automatic rifle hit the enemy’s probability in the 70 metres and lottery probability, don’t you know I can hit the target. However, banded rifles do more damage, bullets are dispersed better, and every battle has the option of banded rifles plus grenades, which results in semi-automatic rifles being completely crushed by banded rifles in some of the biggest battles on the map, such as the Pacific, Moscow, and Tunis battles. Bolt-action rifles with grenades reduce the disadvantage that bolt-action rifles have little chance of firing a second round at close range. There are no semi-automatic models other than the Garland grenade model unlocked in Normandy. Now my infantry are all big bolts and grenade models, except for the zh29 semiautomatic rifle, which is ridiculous. We need to rebalance the two weapons, at least by reducing the spread of semi-automatic rifles
A top-notch star semi-automatic rifle with 10 bullets will drop five rounds at 100 metres. This is absurd. Was I supposed to think it was a medieval musket
The accuracy of the semi-automatic rifle confuses me
You have to stop and shoot it to be accurate
Movement dispersion all weapons have it, even BA
A semi-automatic rifle has a higher recoil and a slower rate of fire than a fully automatic rifle, so if the bullet doesn’t spread as fast as a fully automatic rifle, there’s no need to have a weapon. I think semi-automatic rifles should be as accurate as bolt-action rifles
Unfortunately, semi-automatic rifles also have movement dispersion, but fully automatic rifles do not. It’s not fair
bolt actions do high damage but are slow, good for hitting single targets
semi auto and auto rifles are better when dealing with multiple enemies
Semi-automatic rifles have much greater bullet dispersion than fully automatic rifles, which results in semi-automatic rifles being inferior to fully automatic rifles at medium-close range and inferior to bolt-action rifles at long distances. I think semi-automatic rifles can be removed
This means that semi-automatic rifles are in a very awkward position because their bullet dispersion is different from bolt-action rifles, and because the damage is much lower than bolt-action rifles, they can’t kill with a single shot. Fully automatic rifles do the same damage as semi-automatic rifles, but are more useful because they have a higher rate of fire, which offsets the disadvantage of not being able to kill with a single shot. Semi-automatic RIFLES ALSO HAVE MORE RECOIL, THE fg422 AND avt40 HAVE almost NO recoIL WHEN CROUCHING, AND THE SEMI-AUTOMATIC has a ridiculous amount OF recoIL. This causes semi-automatic rifles to not reach the theoretical rate of fire of 350, which is very bad in the game
Also, semi automatics allow for quick followup shots when you miss, and are better in CQC.
sb
I’m fine with semis the way they are now, with realistic rof.
At range, I can pick targets 1 by 1 in quick succession, provided I aim.
In cqb in a pinch I can unload a magazine.
Semis are jack of all trade weapons, they are seriously good.
i didn’t know about the dispersion on semi autos, that does need a buff