Russian tanks: T-44-85 and / or T-44-100

This game was NEVER balanced, let it be like this now is because of the whiners of the Allies and Soviets who complained about German weapons.This game was NEVER going to be Balanced and I remember the Fantastic phrase that the main allies and Soviets use “Each faction has its strengths and weaknesses”

1 Like

I got 4, and I would be mad if they get removed.

I think T44s are pushing the boundary a little bit , anyway not that it would matter since KT H would be superior to everything, though I wouldn’t mind seeing IS-100 in game , in soviet TT
Object 248 and 245
projects were created to rearm the classic IS-1 with a 100 mm gun.

There were two versions:

with the D-10 cannon (Object 245) development at OKB (ОКБ Опытно-конструкторское бюро )
with cannon S-34 (Object 248) development in CAKB (Central Artillery Design Bureau )
The design was mainly the work of a collective led by V. Grabin. A small series of test vehicles of an unspecified number were built. The type was not introduced into armament, as the IS-2 with an even more powerful 122 mm gun was being developed in parallel. Another factor for not introducing the type was problems with the production of 100 mm ammunition. This was probably a mistake in a way, as the performance of the 100 mm gun was better for anti-tank warfare.
The original designations Object 245 and Object 248 were to be renamed IS-4 and IS-5 after introduction into series production. After the cancellation of Projects 245 and 248, these reserved designations (IS-4 and IS-5) were assigned to the new designs.
image
image

objekt 248 (IS100 s S-34)
image
image

objekt 245(IS 100 s D-10)

The explaination part is copied from my wath each nation needs topic

2 Likes

mate the thing is, that DF decided (wether it’s good or not) to add weapons / tanks / … which were produced at the end of WW2 even without seeying combat.
I understand you from that point of view.

But believe me, DF will continue to do so - russian jet fighter for example. And I am pretty sure they will also add “cold war” on seperate BR in future enlisted. I agree that there should be a split between during WW2 and after war by definition “produced durung WW2 but never saw combat” (except japan because otherwhise TechTree would be nearly empty). And T-44-100 wouldn’t break german tank dominance

Don’t take our discussion personal, neither do I. :slight_smile: :handshake:

I don’t judge anybody for only playing one nation.

That balance never existed in a WW2 game, especially in this semi-realistic game.Each Faction Dominates a Branch

A post-war machine is a machine that did not fight in the war, created as a prototype, which served for the further development of machines. If the car did not go into battle, but another car was created on its basis - (t54), then this is a post-war car. When the war was going on, this car was not on the battlefield, but was in the design bureau (landfill). If there was a combat use, where a group of tanks entered the battle, I would say that the car was fighting. As it is, this is a prototype. Neither the USA, the Reich, Britain, Japan saw a tank on the battlefield, at all. He could have entered the battlefield before the end of the war, but he did not come out at all. All the developments were used in the creation of the T 54. If you think that a prototype is the same as a machine that entered into battle and received an evaluation from the enemy, then you are mistaken, and very much so.

I am in favor of the withdrawal of Japan as a faction, including the Ho-ri.

I don’t have a problem with you either :raised_hand::relieved:

still wrong. the definition is equal from any kind of weapons / tanks / planes which were build at the end and before WW2 ended
image

So cönders to TT then ? Most likely was built at last hours of war, parts lost → rebuilt after war.
Maus and what else.

this post need be closed

So your purpose is to make it 100% win rate for GE and 0% win rate for other Factions.
What you want is impossible on Enlisted.
So if you want it, look for another game.
It used to be like that, but that’s why the game is so broken that it’s changed like it is now to keep it as a game.
If go back then, this game can no longer maintain service.

What you want will only be possible with Single Game, not PvP Multiplay game.

if you really want, feel free to make a suggestion.

Kinda just pointing out your mental gymnastics here, trying to justify something because of something else.

Quite pointless suggestion if only argument is meh muh cönders.

If the weapon/ tank/ plane did not leave the design bureau, they were prototypes, and other weapons were created on its basis, these are not combat weapons. The T 44 hull was used for the development of the T 54/55 model post-war machines. I have already told you 3 times, this machine did not fight, the experience on it is legion on post-war machines. There is not a single battle of this machine, neither in the Third Reich nor in the Battle for Manzhuria. Don’t fake the facts, my friend. Show me the combat report on the use of the t-44 at the front- then we’ll talk, up to this point, this machine remains post-war, did not participate in World War II.

Lmao y’all talking about logic and “it never saw combat” but we’re playing enlisted where jets are gonna be flying over D-Day and and Tiger2H and IS2s are in Stalingrad

1 Like

Don’t forget zomber once said the Gloster Meteor never saw combat even tho the picture that says it was was right in his face lol

1 Like

The example with the Cönders was just a counter-answer to the “logic” of it from the other user. You should have noticed if you were reading. Or was that to hard for you? :kissing_heart:

Agree. Funny fact: few of these people also want to have Tunesia on BR V to play there with Tiger II (H).
Tunesia never saw Tiger II (H) but ¯_(ツ)_/¯

Closed as per OP request.