Enlisted so far in my opinion is rhe best FPS WWII game
me in the market for now.
Like ever game had a peak if players,have a downfaul as well,question is why?
LIke you new all FPS shooters are repetitive with no other purpose to kill more and to grind some new stuff,foe some time that can keep us warm,but soon enough becomes boring!!
So i have suggestion devs implement RTS in Enlisted,some kind of front on World wide map with rowns and aerias we need to win or defend,along with RTS units moving in that map providing our FPS reams resources with whom will play inside of FPS battles.
Possibilities are endless for devs and same for us players,if they choose to go that why,think Enlisted will be one of that so called immortal games of all times…
My reggards to all
The system ecxist in H&G and it’s engenious. The biggest fault in Enlisted, BF, and COD is the lack of meaning and continunity.
You played a game with 300+ kills. Nice. So what?
FPS game studios should really consider continunity in arcade games - like H&G has. And also take notes how not to make an FPS game like H&G has done.
Imagine HLL with actual campaign, holy hell.
acording to road map will come “soon”.
and yes, a war map like heroes and generals using campaign units to play with would be exacly what this game needs.
matches now mean nothing besides xp and fun. nothing.
Well, those developers ain’t dumb I tell you.
Also: “faction commitment” is a great thing. Like Horde&Alliance in WoW was a game-changer.
Yes im veteran in H&G,sioped playing while ago,teah agreed HLL would be prefect as well
Lets hope we reach devs thoughts about this idea,would be perfect for everbody…
i still cant like the game, movement and some details.
maybe one day i ill.
It’s not a “casual shooting game” alright. I can play max 2 matches, then it’s too much.
They arent dumb at all,thats why i even bother writing suggestion to them
To be honest played a lot before,but now same as you 1 or 2 matches and im done
great
I stopped years ago. I was a US “faction hero”.
Infantry and planes all the way.
Was GE,had 30 fully equiped soldiers,with all decent enemy guns
In my opinion, a further incentive to stick with a single faction is among the LAST things Enlisted could possibly need.
Beleive or not GE till beggining GE till death,never ever played as US or Soviet
That’s EXACTLY one of the reasons why no such incentive is needed.
I really hope they will realise potential of implementing RTS in Enlisted…
That gives all new era of tactics and how should you play tour match,its not only run&gun which most ppl like but get bored of it very fast…
Mixture of RTS and FPS games are the future,hope they wull realise finance possibilities of that,of which i disnt really care a bit,but observating that as how to achieve my goal and make them actualy do that…
lols sorry for my english :))))
It brings out bit healthy competition to an otherwise casual game.
Also factionizing creates the notion of Belonging which is a powerful psycholical insentive and creates commitment.
Not belonging to anything makes the game a pass-through - which it basically is. When you’ve unlocked your stuff, what then?
Does winning a game matter? Why bother? Because there’s Allied mains there. Fuck them, that’s why.